Suvikas-Peltonen Eeva, Palmgren Joni, Häggman Verner, Celikkayalar Ercan, Manninen Raija, Airaksinen Marja
Pharmacy Department, Central Hospital of Satakunta, Pori, Finland.
University of Helsinki, Finland.
Int J Pharm Compd. 2017 Nov-Dec;21(6):518-529.
On the hospital wards in Finland, nurses generally reconstitute intravenous medicines, such as antibiotics, analgesics, and antiemetics prescribed by doctors. Medicine reconstitution is prone to many errors. Therefore, it is important to identify incorrect practices in the reconstitution of medicine to improve patient safety in hospitals. The aim of this study was to audit the compounding and reconstituting of intravenous medicines on hospital wards in a secondary-care hospital in Finland by using an assessment tool and microbiological testing for identifying issues posing patient safety risks. A hospital pharmacist conducted an external audit by using a validated 65-item assessment tool for safe-medicine compounding practices on 20 wards of the selected hospital. Also, three different microbiological samples were collected to assure the aseptics. Practices were evaluated using a four-point rating scale of "never performed," "rarely performed," "often performed," and "always performed," and were based on observation and interviews with nurses or ward pharmacists. In addition, glove-, settle plate-, and media fill-tests were collected. Associations between microbial sample results and audit-tool results were discussed. Altogether, only six out of the 65 items were fully implemented in all wards; these were related to logistic practices and quality assurance. More than half of the wards used incorrect practices ("rarely performed" or "never performed") for five items. Most of these obviated practices related to aseptic practices. All media-fill tests were clean but the number of colony forming units in glove samples and settle- plate samples varied from 0 to >100. More contamination was found in wards where environmental conditions were inadequate or the use of gloves was incorrect. Compounding practices were [mostly] quite well adapted, but the aseptic practices needed improvement. Attention should have been directed particularly to good aseptic techniques and compounding environment on the wards. These results can be used for updating the guidelines and for training nurses involved in compounding.
在芬兰的医院病房里,护士通常会重新配制静脉用药,比如医生开的抗生素、镇痛药和止吐药。药物重新配制容易出现许多差错。因此,识别药物重新配制过程中的不当操作对于提高医院患者安全很重要。本研究的目的是通过使用一种评估工具和微生物检测来识别构成患者安全风险的问题,从而对芬兰一家二级护理医院的病房中静脉用药的配制和重新配制情况进行审核。一名医院药剂师通过使用经过验证的65项评估工具对选定医院的20个病房的安全药物配制操作进行了外部审核。此外,还收集了三种不同的微生物样本以确保无菌操作。根据“从未执行”“很少执行”“经常执行”和“总是执行”的四点评分量表,基于对护士或病房药剂师的观察和访谈对操作进行评估。此外,还收集了手套、沉降平板和培养基灌装测试样本。讨论了微生物样本结果与审核工具结果之间的关联。总体而言,65项中的只有6项在所有病房中得到了全面实施;这些与物流操作和质量保证有关。超过一半的病房对5项操作采用了不当做法(“很少执行”或“从未执行”)。这些被忽视的操作大多与无菌操作有关。所有培养基灌装测试均为无菌,但手套样本和沉降平板样本中的菌落形成单位数量从0到超过100不等。在环境条件不佳或手套使用不当的病房中发现了更多污染。配制操作大多相当完善,但无菌操作需要改进。应特别关注病房中的良好无菌技术和配制环境。这些结果可用于更新指南以及培训参与配制工作的护士。