Department of Radiology, São Paulo Federal University/UNIFESP, São Paulo, Brazil; DASA Diagnostic Medicine Imaging Department, São Paulo, Brazil.
Orthopaedic Department, São Paulo Federal University/UNIFESP, São Paulo, Brazil.
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Apr;33(4):1222-1230.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.10.038. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
Rotational malalignment of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a potential cause for revision surgery; therefore, it is important to have valid criteria for evaluation of normal component rotational alignment. Because computed tomography (CT) is considered the most accurate method to assess the rotational alignment of prosthetic components, the objectives in this study were define the femoral component (FC) rotation by measuring the posterior condylar angle (PCA) and the condylar twist angle (CTA) in a patient population that underwent gap-balancing TKA; determine the reliability of the FC rotation by using these measurements; evaluate the inter-relationship between the PCA and CTA; and finally evaluate the frequency and agreement in identification of the medial epicondyle sulcus (MES).
In this retrospective study, 2 radiologists examined 50 CT scans. Mean PCA values of -2.26° and -2.56° (internal rotation) and CTA values of -5.54° and -6.28° (internal rotation) were attained by 2 observers with a higher interobserver concordance for the PCA. Both measurements were considered to be reliable. There was moderate interobserver agreement for MES identification, with the MES present in 64% and 78% of patients, as identified by 2 observers.
Mean FC rotation values as evaluated by PCA were -2.26° and -2.56° and as evaluated by CTA were -5.54° and -6.28°. PCA and CTA measurement by CT is reliable; however, the use of PCA is preferable because of the higher observer concordance. PCA can be inferred by subtracting 3° or 4° from the CTA. MES was identified in 64% and 78% of patients, with only moderate interobserver agreement.
全膝关节置换术(TKA)的旋转对线不良是翻修手术的潜在原因;因此,拥有评估正常假体旋转对线的有效标准非常重要。由于计算机断层扫描(CT)被认为是评估假体组件旋转对线最准确的方法,因此本研究的目的是通过测量后髁角(PCA)和髁间扭曲角(CTA)来定义股骨组件(FC)的旋转;通过使用这些测量来确定 FC 旋转的可靠性;评估 PCA 和 CTA 之间的相互关系;最后评估内侧髁间切迹沟(MES)的识别频率和一致性。
在这项回顾性研究中,2 名放射科医生检查了 50 例 CT 扫描。2 名观察者的平均 PCA 值分别为-2.26°和-2.56°(内旋)和 CTA 值分别为-5.54°和-6.28°(内旋),PCA 的观察者间一致性更高。这两种测量都被认为是可靠的。MES 的识别存在中度观察者间一致性,2 名观察者分别识别出 64%和 78%的患者存在 MES。
通过 PCA 评估的 FC 旋转平均值为-2.26°和-2.56°,通过 CTA 评估的 FC 旋转平均值为-5.54°和-6.28°。通过 CT 进行 PCA 和 CTA 测量是可靠的;然而,由于观察者间的一致性更高,因此更倾向于使用 PCA。通过从 CTA 中减去 3°或 4°,可以推断出 PCA。在 64%和 78%的患者中识别出了 MES,只有中度的观察者间一致性。