Suppr超能文献

居家老年人中的约束使用:系统评价。

Restraint use in older adults in home care: A systematic review.

机构信息

Wit-Gele Kruis van Vlaanderen, Nursing Department, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Mar;79:122-136. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.11.008. Epub 2017 Nov 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To get insight into restraint use in older adults receiving home care and, more specifically, into the definition, prevalence and types of restraint, as well as the reasons for restraint use and the people involved in the decision-making process.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

DATA SOURCES

Four databases (i.e. Pubmed, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Library) were systematically searched from inception to end of April 2017.

REVIEW METHODS

The study encompassed qualitative and quantitative research on restraint use in older adults receiving home care that reported definitions of restraint, prevalence of use, types of restraint, reasons for use or the people involved. We considered publications written in English, French, Dutch and German. One reviewer performed the search and made the initial selection based on titles and abstracts. The final selection was made by two reviewers working independently; they also assessed study quality. We used an integrated design to synthesise the findings.

RESULTS

Eight studies were reviewed (one qualitative, seven quantitative) ranging in quality from moderate to high. The review indicated there was no single, clear definition of restraint. The prevalence of restraint use ranged from 5% to 24.7%, with various types of restraint being used. Families played an important role in the decision-making process and application of restraints; general practitioners were less involved. Specific reasons, other than safety for using restraints in home care were noted (e.g. delay to nursing home admission; to provide respite for an informal caregiver).

CONCLUSIONS

Contrary to the current socio demographical evolutions resulting in an increasing demand of restraint use in home care, research on this subject is still scarce and recent. The limited evidence however points to the challenging complexity and specificity of home care regarding restraint use. Given these serious challenges for clinical practice, more research about restraint use in home care is urgently needed.

摘要

目的

深入了解接受家庭护理的老年人中使用约束的情况,更具体地了解约束的定义、流行率和类型,以及使用约束的原因和参与决策过程的人员。

设计

系统综述。

资料来源

从开始到 2017 年 4 月底,系统地搜索了四个数据库(即 Pubmed、CINAHL、Embase、Cochrane Library)。

研究方法

该研究包括定性和定量研究,涉及接受家庭护理的老年人中使用约束的情况,报告了约束的定义、使用的流行率、约束的类型、使用的原因或参与决策的人员。我们考虑了以英语、法语、荷兰语和德语撰写的出版物。一位评审员进行了搜索,并根据标题和摘要进行了初步选择。最终选择由两名独立工作的评审员进行;他们还评估了研究质量。我们使用综合设计来综合研究结果。

结果

共审查了 8 项研究(1 项定性研究,7 项定量研究),质量从中等到较高不等。审查结果表明,约束的定义不明确。约束的使用流行率从 5%到 24.7%不等,使用了各种类型的约束。家庭在决策过程和约束的应用中起着重要作用;全科医生的参与较少。除了家庭护理中使用约束的安全性之外,还注意到了特定的原因(例如,延迟入住养老院;为非正式护理人员提供喘息机会)。

结论

与当前社会人口统计学的发展趋势相反,家庭护理中对约束的需求不断增加,但关于这一主题的研究仍然很少且相对较新。然而,有限的证据表明,家庭护理中约束的使用具有挑战性的复杂性和特殊性。鉴于这些对临床实践的严重挑战,迫切需要更多关于家庭护理中约束使用的研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验