Sparks Cheryl L, Liu Wen C, Cleland Joshua A, Kelly Joseph P, Dyer Sarah J, Szetela Kathryn M, Elliott James M
Rehabilitation Center of Expertise, OSF Healthcare, Peoria, Illinois.
Department of Radiology, Saint Francis Medical Center, OSF Healthcare, Peoria, Illinois.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2017 Nov-Dec;40(9):625-634. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2017.07.010.
The purpose of this study was to examine whether cerebral activation in response to noxious mechanical stimuli varies with thrust manipulation (TM) when compared with sham manipulation (SM) as measured by blood oxygenation level-dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging.
Twenty-four volunteers (67% female) with complaints of acute or subacute mechanical (nontraumatic) neck pain satisfied eligibility requirements and agreed to participate. Participants were randomized to receive TM to the thoracic spine or SM, and then underwent functional magnetic resonance scanning while receiving noxious stimuli before and after TM or SM. An 11-point numeric pain rating scale was administered pre- and postmanipulation for neck pain and to determine perceptions of pain intensity with respect to neck pain and mechanical stimuli. Blood oxygenation level-dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging recorded the cerebral hemodynamic response to the mechanical stimuli.
Imaging revealed significant group differences, with those individuals in the manipulation group exhibiting increased areas of activation (postmanipulation) in the insular and somatosensory cortices and individuals in the sham group exhibiting greater areas of activation in the precentral gyrus, supplementary motor area, and cingulate cortices (P < .05). However, between-group differences on the numeric pain rating scale for mechanical stimuli and for self-reported neck pain were not statistically significant.
This study provides preliminary level 2b evidence suggesting cortical responses in patients with nontraumatic neck pain may vary between thoracic TM and a sham comparator.
本研究旨在通过血氧水平依赖性功能磁共振成像来检测,与假手法(SM)相比,有害机械刺激诱发的大脑激活是否会因推力手法(TM)而有所不同。
24名主诉急性或亚急性机械性(非创伤性)颈部疼痛的志愿者(67%为女性)符合入选标准并同意参与研究。参与者被随机分为接受胸椎TM组或SM组,然后在TM或SM前后接受有害刺激时进行功能磁共振扫描。在手法操作前后使用11点数字疼痛评分量表评估颈部疼痛情况,并确定对颈部疼痛和机械刺激的疼痛强度感知。血氧水平依赖性功能磁共振成像记录了对机械刺激的脑血流动力学反应。
成像显示出显著的组间差异,手法操作组个体在岛叶和体感皮层的激活区域增加(手法操作后),而假手法组个体在中央前回、辅助运动区和扣带回皮层的激活区域更大(P < .05)。然而,在机械刺激和自我报告的颈部疼痛的数字疼痛评分量表上,组间差异无统计学意义。
本研究提供了初步的2b级证据,表明非创伤性颈部疼痛患者的皮层反应在胸椎TM和假对照之间可能存在差异。