Hu Qian, Wang Qiuqin, Duan Peibei, Meng Fang, Gong Xiuqin, Hu Shufeng, Zhu Xiaozhen
First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of CM, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu Province, China.
Nursing School, Nanjing University of CM.
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2016 Dec 12;36(12):1257-1262. doi: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.2016.12.009.
To compare the difference in the therapeutic effect on post-infectious cough differentiated as wind-cold retention in the lung between the combined therapy of scraping and decoction and the simple application of decoction.
Eighty patients were randomized into a combined therapy group and a Chinese herbal medicine group, 40 cases in each one. In the Chinese herbal medicine group, the oral administration of decoction was used. The main ingredients included , , , , , , , , etc., one dose a day, twice a day. In the combined therapy group, on the basis of the treatment as the Chinese herbal medicine group, scraping therapy was added and applied to the bladder meridian of foot-, the lung meridian of hand-, the conception vessel and the governor vessel, focusing on Tiantu (CV 22), Baihui (GV 20), Dazhui (GV 14), Feishu (BL 13), Fengmen (BL 12), Taiyuan (LU 9), Lieque (LU 7) and Fengchi (GB 20), once a week and one-week treatment as one session. Totally, the continuous two sessions were required in the two groups. The cough symptom score, cough remission time, relapse, TCM syndrome score, the score of Leicester cough questionnaire (LCQ), SP concentration in the supernatant of the induced sputum before and after treatment as well as clinical efficacy were observed in the two groups.
The cough symptom score, TCM symptom score and SP concentration in the supernatant of the induced sputum were all apparently reduced after treatment in the patients of the two groups (all <0.01). The scores in the combined therapy group were reduced in the higher amplitude as compared with those in the Chinese herbal medicine group (all <0.01). The total effective rate was 95.0% (38/40) in the combined therapy group, better than 87.5% (35/40) in the Chinese herbal medicine group (<0.05). Regarding the cough remission time and relapse rate, the results in the combined therapy group were better than those in the Chinese herbal medicine group[(5.3±1.2) d vs (7.4±1.5) d, <0.01; 0% (0/19) vs 62.5% (5/8), <0.01]. The scoreo of LCQ was all apparently improved in the patients of the two groups (both <0.01), and the score in the combined therapy group was higher than that in the Chinese herbal medicine group (<0.01).
Scraping therapy combined with decoction and the simple application of decoction all relieve the symptoms of post-infectious cough and improves the living quality. The therapeutic effects of the combined therapy are superior to the oral administration of decoction.
比较刮痧联合汤药与单纯应用汤药治疗感染后咳嗽风寒袭肺证的疗效差异。
将80例患者随机分为联合治疗组和中药组,每组40例。中药组采用口服汤药治疗,主要药物组成有[具体药物名称未给出]等,每日1剂,分2次服用。联合治疗组在中药组治疗基础上加用刮痧疗法,刮足太阳膀胱经、手太阴肺经、任脉和督脉,重点刮天突(CV 22)、百会(GV 20)、大椎(GV 14)、肺俞(BL 13)、风门(BL 12)、太渊(LU 9)、列缺(LU 7)、风池(GB 20),每周1次,1周为1个疗程,两组均连续治疗2个疗程。观察两组患者的咳嗽症状评分、咳嗽缓解时间、复发情况、中医证候评分、莱斯特咳嗽问卷(LCQ)评分、治疗前后诱导痰上清液中SP浓度及临床疗效。
两组患者治疗后咳嗽症状评分、中医症状评分及诱导痰上清液中SP浓度均明显降低(均P<0.01)。联合治疗组各项评分较中药组下降幅度更大(均P<0.01)。联合治疗组总有效率为95.0%(38/40),优于中药组的87.5%(35/40)(P<0.05)。在咳嗽缓解时间及复发率方面,联合治疗组结果优于中药组[(5.3±1.2)d比(7.4±1.5)d,P<0.01;0%(0/19)比62.5%(5/8),P<0.01]。两组患者LCQ评分均明显改善(均P<0.01),且联合治疗组评分高于中药组(P<0.01)。
刮痧联合汤药与单纯应用汤药均能缓解感染后咳嗽症状,提高生活质量,且联合治疗的疗效优于单纯口服汤药。