Luani Blerim, Groscheck Thomas, Genz Conrad, Tanev Ivan, Rauwolf Thomas, Herold Joerg, Medunjanin Senad, Schmeisser Alexander, Braun-Dullaeus Rüdiger C
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology and Angiology, Magdeburg University, Leipzigerstr. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017 Dec 12;17(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s12872-017-0728-6.
Interventional closure of the left atrial appendage (LAA) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, high thromboembolic and bleeding risk or bleeding history is an alternative therapeutic strategy to oral anticoagulation. It is not known if the exclusion of the LAA from the blood circulation affects the left atrial volume (LAV) and consequently its prognostic value or the circulatory performance of the heart in humans.
We aimed to prospectively assess potential changes in baseline LAV, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), NT-proBNP-level and the covered distance in the 6-min walk-test 6 weeks and 6 months after LAA closure with the WATCHMAN™ device. We used serial 3-dimensional transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography to assess LAV, residual interatrial shunt and device performance in 58 consecutive patients with successful LAA closure.
Accurate 3D-echocardiographic data for LAV measurements were evaluable for 51 (91%) patients. Maximum LAV (LAVmax) at baseline was 102.8 ± 30.8 ml and increased significantly to 107.7 ± 32.8 ml after 6 weeks (p < 0.01) and 113.5 ± 34.2 ml after 6 months (p < 0.01). Minimal LAV (LAVmin) increased from 76.9 ± 29.5 ml at baseline to 81.8 ± 30.2 ml after 45 days (p < 0.01) and 82.1 ± 33.3 ml after 6 months (p < 0.01). Similarly, their indexes to BSA (LAVImax and LAVImin) increased significantly, as well. Patients without a residual left-to-right interatrial shunt showed a significantly higher increase in LAVmax or LAVmin. Baseline LVEF, NT-proBNP-level or the distance covered at the 6-min walk test did not significantly change 6 weeks or 6 months after LAA closure.
LAVmax and LAVmin increase significantly after interventional LAA closure. LA enlargement does not correlate with clinical progression of heart failure. Persistent left-to-right interatrial shunt counteracts the LA enlargement. A reduced LA compliance after exclusion of the LAA from the blood circulation with consecutive increase in LA pressure may be a potential cause of LA enlargement and warrants further investigation.
German Clinical Trials Register ID: DRKS00010768 ; Registration Date 07.07.2016.
对于非瓣膜性心房颤动、高血栓栓塞和出血风险或有出血史的患者,经皮左心耳封堵术是口服抗凝治疗的替代治疗策略。目前尚不清楚左心耳从血液循环中排除是否会影响左心房容积(LAV),进而影响其预后价值或人体心脏的循环功能。
我们旨在前瞻性评估使用WATCHMAN™ 装置封堵左心耳后6周和6个月时,基线LAV、左心室射血分数(LVEF)、NT-proBNP水平以及6分钟步行试验中行走距离的潜在变化。我们使用连续三维经胸和经食管超声心动图评估58例成功封堵左心耳患者的LAV、残余心房分流和装置性能。
51例(91%)患者可获得用于评估LAV测量的三维超声心动图数据。基线时最大LAV(LAVmax)为102.8±30.8ml,6周后显著增加至107.7±32.8ml(p<0.01),6个月后增加至113.5±34.2ml(p<0.01)。最小LAV(LAVmin)从基线时的76.9±29.5ml增加至45天后的81.8±30.2ml(p<0.01),6个月后增加至82.1±33.3ml(p<0.01)。同样,它们与体表面积的指数(LAVImax和LAVImin)也显著增加。无残余左向右心房分流的患者LAVmax或LAVmin增加更为显著。基线LVEF、NT-proBNP水平或6分钟步行试验中的行走距离在左心耳封堵后6周或6个月时无显著变化。
经皮左心耳封堵术后LAVmax和LAVmin显著增加。左心房扩大与心力衰竭的临床进展无关。持续的左向右心房分流可抵消左心房扩大。左心耳从血液循环中排除后左心房顺应性降低,伴左心房压力持续升高,可能是左心房扩大的潜在原因,值得进一步研究。
德国临床试验注册编号:DRKS00010768;注册日期:2016年7月7日。