1 Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Institute for Addiction Research, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam, The Netherlands .
2 The Institute of Criminal Law and Criminology, Law Faculty, Leiden University , Leiden, The Netherlands .
Brain Connect. 2018 Mar;8(2):60-67. doi: 10.1089/brain.2017.0542.
High-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (HF-rTMS) has gained great interest in multiple clinical and research fields and is believed to accomplish its effect by influencing neuronal networks. The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) is frequently chosen as the cortical target for HF-rTMS. However, very little is known about the differential effect of HF-rTMS over the left and right dlPFC on intrinsic functional connectivity networks in patients or in healthy individuals. The current study assessed the differential effects of left or right HF-rTMS (corrected for sham) on intrinsic independent component analysis (ICA)-defined functional connectivity networks in a sample of 45 healthy individuals. All subjects had a first scanning session in which baseline functional connectivity was assessed. During the second session, individuals received one session of left, right, or sham dlPFC HF-rTMS (60 5-sec trains of 10 Hz at 110% motor threshold). The sham condition was used to correct for time and placebo effects. ICAs were performed to assess baseline differences and stimulation effects on within- and between-network functional connectivity. Stimulation of the left dlPFC resulted in decreased functional connectivity in the salience network, whereas right dlPFC stimulation resulted in increased functional connectivity within this network. No differences between left or right dlPFC stimulation were found in between-network connectivity. These results suggest that left and right HF-rTMS may have differential effects, and more research is needed on the clinical consequences.
高频重复经颅磁刺激(HF-rTMS)在多个临床和研究领域引起了极大的兴趣,被认为通过影响神经网络来实现其效果。背外侧前额叶皮层(dlPFC)经常被选为 HF-rTMS 的皮质靶点。然而,对于 HF-rTMS 对左、右 dlPFC 对患者或健康个体内在功能连接网络的影响,知之甚少。本研究评估了在 45 名健康个体样本中,左或右 HF-rTMS(针对假刺激进行校正)对内在独立成分分析(ICA)定义的功能连接网络的差异影响。所有受试者均进行了第一次扫描,以评估基线功能连接。在第二次扫描期间,个体接受了一次左、右或假 dlPFC HF-rTMS 刺激(60 个 5 秒 10 Hz 脉冲,刺激强度为 110%运动阈值)。假刺激条件用于校正时间和安慰剂效应。进行 ICA 以评估基线差异以及刺激对内和网络间功能连接的影响。左 dlPFC 刺激导致显着网络中的功能连接减少,而右 dlPFC 刺激导致该网络内的功能连接增加。在网络间连接中未发现左或右 dlPFC 刺激之间的差异。这些结果表明,左和右 HF-rTMS 可能具有不同的影响,需要更多的临床后果研究。