Tinsley Grant M, Urbina Stacie, Mullins Jacy, Outlaw Jordan, Hayward Sara, Stone Matt, Foster Cliffa, Wilborn Colin, Taylor Lem
Department of Kinesiology & Sport Management, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX.
Department of Exercise & Sports Science, Human Performance Lab, University of Mary Hardin-Baylor, Belton, TX.
J Sports Sci Med. 2017 Dec 1;16(4):459-467. eCollection 2017 Dec.
Dietary supplementation is commonly employed by individuals seeking to improve body composition and exercise performance. The purpose of the present study was to examine the safety and effectiveness of a commercially available dietary supplement designed to promote thermogenesis and fat loss. In a randomized double-blind trial, participants were assigned to consume placebo or a multi-ingredient supplement containing caffeine, green tea extract, l-carnitine, evodiamine and other ingredients that purportedly enhance thermogenesis. The study included acute baseline testing, a 6-week progressive resistance training and supplementation intervention, and post-intervention testing. Laboratory assessments included resting energy expenditure responses to acute supplement ingestion, evaluation of body composition and muscular performance, and analysis of blood variables (metabolic panel, testosterone, estrogen and cortisol). Dependent variables were analyzed using ANOVA with repeated measures. No unfavorable effects of supplementation were reported, and the supplement did not adversely affect safety markers. However, the supplement did not reduce fat mass or increase lean mass relative to placebo. In the supplement group, lower body maximal strength was increased relative to placebo (+18%, d=1.1 vs. +10%, d=0.5), and cortisol concentrations were decreased relative to placebo (-16%; d=-0.4 vs. +15%, d=.75). However, no differences were observed for upper body maximal strength or muscular endurance. REE increased in response to both supplement and placebo ingestion (placebo: +5%; supplement: +11.5%), but the difference between conditions was not statistically significant. Overall, some select parameters may have been beneficially modified by supplementation, but this did not result in superior weight or fat loss over 6 weeks of supplementation and resistance training.
寻求改善身体成分和运动表现的人通常会采用膳食补充剂。本研究的目的是检验一种市售膳食补充剂的安全性和有效性,该补充剂旨在促进产热和减脂。在一项随机双盲试验中,参与者被分配食用安慰剂或一种含有咖啡因、绿茶提取物、左旋肉碱、吴茱萸碱和其他据称能增强产热的成分的多成分补充剂。该研究包括急性基线测试、为期6周的渐进性抗阻训练和补充剂干预,以及干预后测试。实验室评估包括对急性补充剂摄入的静息能量消耗反应、身体成分和肌肉性能评估,以及血液变量(代谢指标、睾酮、雌激素和皮质醇)分析。使用重复测量方差分析对因变量进行分析。未报告补充剂有不良影响,且该补充剂未对安全指标产生不利影响。然而,与安慰剂相比,该补充剂并未减少脂肪量或增加瘦体重。在补充剂组中,相对于安慰剂,下肢最大力量有所增加(+18%,d = 1.1,而安慰剂组为+10%,d = 0.5),皮质醇浓度相对于安慰剂有所降低(-16%;d = -0.4,而安慰剂组为+15%,d = 0.75)。然而,在上肢最大力量或肌肉耐力方面未观察到差异。补充剂和安慰剂摄入后静息能量消耗均增加(安慰剂组:+5%;补充剂组:+11.5%),但两组之间的差异无统计学意义。总体而言,补充剂可能对一些选定参数产生了有益的改变,但在6周的补充剂和抗阻训练期间,这并未导致体重或脂肪减少方面优于安慰剂。