Ali Muhammad J, Balasekaran Govindasamy, Kay Hiang Hoon, Seet Gim Lee Gerald
School of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
Institute for Sports Research, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Physiol Rep. 2017 Dec;5(24). doi: 10.14814/phy2.13546.
This study investigated the physiological difference in recreational runners between a noncontinuous and a continuous endurance training protocol. It also aimed to determine physiological surrogate that could monitor metabolic demand of prolonged running in real-time. For data collection, a total of 18 active male recreational runners were recruited. Physiological (HR, RR, RER, O, BLa), and overall perceptual (RPE) responses were recorded against three designed test sessions. Session 1 included O test to determine critical speed (CS) at anaerobic threshold (AT). Session 2 was the noncontinuous CS test until exhaustion, having 4:1 min work-to-rest ratio at CS, whereas session 3 was the continuous CS test till exhaustion. As 1-min recovery during session 2 may change fatigue behavior, it was hypothesized that it will significantly change the physiological stress and hence endurance outcomes. Results reported average time to exhaustion (TTE) was 37.33(9.8) mins for session 2 and 23.28(9.87) mins for session 3. Participants experienced relatively higher metabolic demand (BLa) 6.78(1.43) mmol.l in session 3 as compared to session 2 (5.52(0.93) mmol.l). RER was observed to increase in session 3 and decrease in session 2. Student's paired -test only reported a significant difference in TTE, ṼO, RER, RPE, and BLa at "End" between session 2 and 3. Reported difference in RPE and %HR at "AT" were 5 (2.2) and 89.8 (2.60)% during session 2 and 6 (2.5) and 89.8 (2.59)% during session 3, respectively. Regression analysis reported strong correlation of %HR (adj. R-square = 0.588) with BLa than RPE (adj. R-square = 0.541). The summary of findings suggests that decreasing RER increased TTE and reduced BLa toward "End" during session 2 which might have helped to have better endurance. The %HR was identified to be used as a better noninvasive surrogate of endurance intensity estimator.
本研究调查了休闲跑步者在非连续和连续耐力训练方案下的生理差异。它还旨在确定能够实时监测长时间跑步代谢需求的生理替代指标。为了收集数据,共招募了18名活跃的男性休闲跑步者。记录了针对三个设计测试环节的生理指标(心率、呼吸频率、呼吸交换率、摄氧量、血乳酸)和整体感知指标(主观用力程度)。环节1包括摄氧量测试,以确定无氧阈(AT)时的临界速度(CS)。环节2是直到力竭的非连续临界速度测试,在临界速度下工作与休息比例为4:1分钟,而环节3是直到力竭的连续临界速度测试。由于环节2中的1分钟恢复可能会改变疲劳行为,因此假设这将显著改变生理应激,进而影响耐力结果。结果显示,环节2的平均力竭时间(TTE)为37.33(9.8)分钟,环节3为23.28(9.87)分钟。与环节2(5.52(0.93)mmol/L)相比,参与者在环节3中经历了相对更高的代谢需求(血乳酸),为6.78(1.43)mmol/L。观察到呼吸交换率在环节3中增加,在环节2中降低。学生配对检验仅报告了环节2和环节3在“结束”时力竭时间、摄氧量、呼吸交换率、主观用力程度和血乳酸的显著差异。环节2和环节3在“无氧阈”时主观用力程度和心率百分比的报告差异分别为5(2.2)和89.8(2.60)%以及6(2.5)和89.8(2.59)%。回归分析报告心率百分比(调整后R平方 = 0.588)与血乳酸的相关性强于主观用力程度(调整后R平方 = 0.541)。研究结果总结表明,在环节2中呼吸交换率降低会增加力竭时间并在“结束”时降低血乳酸,这可能有助于获得更好的耐力。心率百分比被确定为更好的耐力强度估计无创替代指标。