Suppr超能文献

全氟烷基化物质(PFASs)的细胞积累与脂质结合——与溶酶体促渗药物的比较

Cellular accumulation and lipid binding of perfluorinated alkylated substances (PFASs) - A comparison with lysosomotropic drugs.

作者信息

Sanchez Garcia Diana, Sjödin Marcus, Hellstrandh Magnus, Norinder Ulf, Nikiforova Violetta, Lindberg Johan, Wincent Emma, Bergman Åke, Cotgreave Ian, Munic Kos Vesna

机构信息

Swetox, Karolinska Institutet, Unit of Toxicology Sciences, Forskargatan 20, SE-151 36 Södertälje, Sweden.

Swetox, Karolinska Institutet, Unit of Toxicology Sciences, Forskargatan 20, SE-151 36 Södertälje, Sweden.

出版信息

Chem Biol Interact. 2018 Feb 1;281:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2017.12.021. Epub 2017 Dec 14.

Abstract

Many chemicals accumulate in organisms through a variety of different mechanisms. Cationic amphiphilic drugs (CADs) accumulate in lysosomes and bind to membranes causing phospholipidosis, whereas many lipophilic chemicals target adipose tissue. Perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) are widely used as surfactants, but many of them are highly bioaccumulating and persistent in the environment, making them notorious environmental toxicants. Understanding the mechanisms of their bioaccumulation is, therefore, important for their regulation and substitution with new, less harmful chemicals. We compared the highly bioaccumulative perfluorooctanesulfonic acid PFOS to its three less bioaccumulative alternatives perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA) and perfluorobutane sulfonic acid (PFBS), in their ability to accumulate and remain in lung epithelial cells (NCI-H292) and adipocytes (3T3-L1K) in vitro. As a reference point we tested a set of cationic amphiphilic drugs (CADs), known to highly accumulate in cells and strongly bind to phospholipids, together with their respective non-CAD controls. Finally, all compounds were examined for their ability to bind to neutral lipids and phospholipids in cell-free systems. Cellular accumulation and retention of the test compounds were highly correlated between the lung epithelial cells and adipocytes. Interestingly, although an anion itself, intensities of PFOS accumulation and retention in cells were comparable to those of CAD compounds, but PFOS failed to induce phospholipidosis or alter lysosomal volume. Compared to other lipophilicity measures, phospholipophilicity shows the highest correlation (Rˆ2 = 0.75) to cellular accumulation data in both cell types and best distinguishes between high and low accumulating compounds. This indicates that binding to phospholipids may be the most important component in driving high cellular accumulation in lung epithelial cells, as well as in adipocytes, and for both CADs and bioaccumulating PFASs. Obtained continuous PLS models based on compound's affinity for phospholipids and neutral lipids can be used as good prediction models of cellular accumulation and retention of PFASs and CADs.

摘要

许多化学物质通过各种不同机制在生物体中积累。阳离子两亲性药物(CADs)在溶酶体中积累并与膜结合,导致磷脂蓄积,而许多亲脂性化学物质则靶向脂肪组织。全氟烷基物质(PFASs)被广泛用作表面活性剂,但其中许多物质具有高度生物累积性且在环境中持久存在,使其成为臭名昭著的环境毒物。因此,了解它们的生物累积机制对于其监管以及用新的、危害较小的化学物质进行替代至关重要。我们比较了具有高度生物累积性的全氟辛烷磺酸(PFOS)与其三种生物累积性较低的替代品全氟辛酸(PFOA)、全氟己酸(PFHxA)和全氟丁烷磺酸(PFBS)在体外肺上皮细胞(NCI-H292)和脂肪细胞(3T3-L1K)中积累和留存的能力。作为参考点,我们测试了一组已知在细胞中高度积累并与磷脂强烈结合的阳离子两亲性药物(CADs)及其各自的非CAD对照。最后,在无细胞系统中检测了所有化合物与中性脂质和磷脂结合的能力。测试化合物在肺上皮细胞和脂肪细胞之间的细胞积累和留存高度相关。有趣的是,尽管PFOS本身是一种阴离子,但其在细胞中的积累和留存强度与CAD化合物相当,但PFOS未能诱导磷脂蓄积或改变溶酶体体积。与其他亲脂性指标相比,磷脂亲脂性与两种细胞类型中的细胞积累数据显示出最高的相关性(Rˆ2 = 0.75),并且能最好地区分高积累和低积累化合物。这表明与磷脂结合可能是驱动肺上皮细胞和脂肪细胞中高细胞积累的最重要因素,对于CADs和具有生物累积性的PFASs均如此。基于化合物对磷脂和中性脂质的亲和力获得的连续偏最小二乘(PLS)模型可作为PFASs和CADs细胞积累和留存的良好预测模型。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验