Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, The University of British Columbia, 2202, Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Ambio. 2018 Sep;47(5):595-607. doi: 10.1007/s13280-017-0998-3. Epub 2017 Dec 16.
Evaluating progress towards environmental sustainability goals can be difficult due to a lack of measurable benchmarks and insufficient or uncertain data. Marine settings are particularly challenging, as stakeholders and objectives tend to be less well defined and ecosystem components have high natural variability and are difficult to observe directly. Fuzzy logic expert systems are useful analytical frameworks to evaluate such systems, and we develop such a model here to formally evaluate progress towards sustainability targets based on diverse sets of indicators. Evaluation criteria include recent (since policy enactment) and historical (from earliest known state) change, type of indicators (state, benefit, pressure, response), time span and spatial scope, and the suitability of an indicator in reflecting progress toward a specific objective. A key aspect of the framework is that all assumptions are transparent and modifiable to fit different social and ecological contexts. We test the method by evaluating progress towards four Aichi Biodiversity Targets in Canadian oceans, including quantitative progress scores, information gaps, and the sensitivity of results to model and data assumptions. For Canadian marine systems, national protection plans and biodiversity awareness show good progress, but species and ecosystem states overall do not show strong improvement. Well-defined goals are vital for successful policy implementation, as ambiguity allows for conflicting potential indicators, which in natural systems increases uncertainty in progress evaluations. Importantly, our framework can be easily adapted to assess progress towards policy goals with different themes, globally or in specific regions.
由于缺乏可衡量的基准以及数据不足或不确定,评估环境可持续性目标的进展可能具有挑战性。海洋环境尤其具有挑战性,因为利益相关者和目标往往定义不明确,生态系统组成部分具有高度的自然变异性,并且难以直接观察。模糊逻辑专家系统是评估此类系统的有用分析框架,我们在这里开发了这样一个模型,根据各种指标来正式评估可持续性目标的进展情况。评估标准包括近期(自政策颁布以来)和历史(从最早已知状态开始)的变化、指标类型(状态、效益、压力、响应)、时间跨度和空间范围,以及指标在反映特定目标进展方面的适宜性。该框架的一个关键方面是,所有假设都是透明的,可以修改以适应不同的社会和生态背景。我们通过评估加拿大海洋中四个爱知生物多样性目标的进展情况来测试该方法,包括定量进展评分、信息差距以及结果对模型和数据假设的敏感性。对于加拿大海洋系统,国家保护计划和生物多样性意识显示出良好的进展,但物种和生态系统状况总体上并没有显示出明显的改善。明确的目标对于成功实施政策至关重要,因为模糊性允许存在相互冲突的潜在指标,这在自然系统中增加了对进展评估的不确定性。重要的是,我们的框架可以轻松适应评估具有不同主题的政策目标的进展情况,无论是在全球范围内还是在特定地区。