Suppr超能文献

从幻想走向现实:在虚构媒体中及通过虚构媒体管理生物医学风险情绪。

From fantasy to reality: managing biomedical risk emotions in and through fictional media.

作者信息

Cottingham Marci D, Fisher Jill A

机构信息

Department of Sociology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Social Medicine and Center for Bioethics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

Health Risk Soc. 2017;19(5-6):284-300. doi: 10.1080/13698575.2017.1350638. Epub 2017 Jul 11.

Abstract

In this article, we explore the role that fictional media (film and television) play in evoking and managing collective and individual anxieties towards biomedical research. We draw on two data sets: fictional media depictions of human research subjects and interviews with Phase I clinical trial participants conducted in the USA in 2013. We show how fictional media provide an outlet for collective uncertainties surrounding biomedical research through depictions that mock and dehumanise research participants, using such emotions of shock, disgust, pity, amusement and humour. We analyse how themes from fictional media are also used to manage actual clinical trial participants' own anxiety concerning the unknown risks of research participation. By contrasting the reality of their research experience with fantasy derived from entertainment media, clinical trial participants minimise the seriousness of the side effects they have or may experience in actual Phase I clinical trials. We conclude that fictional media serve an important role in the collective and individual management of risk emotion.

摘要

在本文中,我们探讨虚构媒体(电影和电视)在引发和管理对生物医学研究的集体及个人焦虑方面所起的作用。我们借鉴了两个数据集:对人类研究对象的虚构媒体描绘以及2013年在美国对一期临床试验参与者进行的访谈。我们展示了虚构媒体如何通过对研究参与者进行嘲讽和非人化的描绘,利用震惊、厌恶、怜悯、娱乐和幽默等情绪,为围绕生物医学研究的集体不确定性提供一个宣泄口。我们分析了虚构媒体中的主题如何也被用于管理实际临床试验参与者自身对参与研究的未知风险的焦虑。通过将他们的研究经历现实与源自娱乐媒体的幻想进行对比,临床试验参与者将他们在实际一期临床试验中已经或可能经历的副作用的严重性降到最低。我们得出结论,虚构媒体在集体和个人对风险情绪的管理中发挥着重要作用。

相似文献

1
From fantasy to reality: managing biomedical risk emotions in and through fictional media.
Health Risk Soc. 2017;19(5-6):284-300. doi: 10.1080/13698575.2017.1350638. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
2
This isn't going to end well: Fictional representations of medical research in television and film.
Public Underst Sci. 2017 Jul;26(5):564-578. doi: 10.1177/0963662516641339. Epub 2016 Apr 5.
4
Empathy with fictional stories: reconsideration of the fantasy scale of the interpersonal reactivity index.
Psychol Rep. 2012 Feb;110(1):304-14. doi: 10.2466/02.07.09.11.PR0.110.1.304-314.
5
Suicide and the media. Part II: Portrayal in fictional media.
Crisis. 2001;22(4):155-62. doi: 10.1027//0227-5910.22.4.155.
6
How, when, and what do young children learn from fictional stories?
J Exp Child Psychol. 2022 Sep;221:105445. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105445. Epub 2022 May 5.
9
Comparison of personal versus fictional narratives of children with language impairment.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2008 May;17(2):194-206. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2008/019).
10
Fictional emotions and emotional reactions to social robots as depictions of social agents.
Behav Brain Sci. 2023 Apr 5;46:e24. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X22001716.

引用本文的文献

1
Speculating on Precarious Income: Finance Cultures and the Risky Strategies of Healthy Volunteers in Clinical Drug Trials.
J Cult Econ. 2021;14(4):464-484. doi: 10.1080/17530350.2020.1850504. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
2
Healthy volunteers' perceptions of risk in US Phase I clinical trials: A mixed-methods study.
PLoS Med. 2018 Nov 20;15(11):e1002698. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002698. eCollection 2018 Nov.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk and Emotion Among Healthy Volunteers in Clinical Trials.
Soc Psychol Q. 2016 Sep;79(3):222-242. doi: 10.1177/0190272516657655. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
2
This isn't going to end well: Fictional representations of medical research in television and film.
Public Underst Sci. 2017 Jul;26(5):564-578. doi: 10.1177/0963662516641339. Epub 2016 Apr 5.
4
Emotions, affects and the production of social life.
Br J Sociol. 2015 Jun;66(2):301-18. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12119. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
5
Using "clinical trial diaries" to track patterns of participation for serial healthy volunteers in U.S. phase I studies.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2015 Feb;10(1):65-75. doi: 10.1177/1556264614568280. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
6
Why should we promote public engagement with science?
Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jan;23(1):4-15. doi: 10.1177/0963662513518154.
8
Challenging assumptions about minority participation in US clinical research.
Am J Public Health. 2011 Dec;101(12):2217-22. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300279. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
9
Sex, gender, and pharmaceutical politics: From drug development to marketing.
Gend Med. 2010 Aug;7(4):357-70. doi: 10.1016/j.genm.2010.08.003.
10
Novel perspectives on bioethics.
Chron High Educ. 2005 May 13;51(36):B6-8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验