Suppr超能文献

增强型康复试点与国家手术质量改进计划住院时间的关联。

Association of an Enhanced Recovery Pilot With Length of Stay in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.

Division of Research and Optimal Patient Care, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois.

出版信息

JAMA Surg. 2018 Apr 1;153(4):358-365. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.4906.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Enhanced recovery protocols (ERPs) are standardized care plans of best practices that can decrease morbidity and length of stay (LOS). However, many hospitals need help with implementation. The Enhanced Recovery in National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ERIN) pilot was designed to support ERP implementation.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association of the ERIN pilot with LOS after colectomy.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Using a difference-in-differences design, pilot LOS before and after ERP implementation was compared with matched controls in a hierarchical model, adjusting for case mix and random effects of hospitals and matched pairs. The setting was 15 hospitals of varied size and academic status from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Preimplementation and postimplementation colectomy cases (July 1, 2013, to December 31, 2015) were collected using novel ERIN variables. Emergency and septic cases were excluded. A propensity score match identified a 2:1 control cohort of patients undergoing colectomy at non-ERIN hospitals.

INTERVENTIONS

Pilot hospitals developed and implemented ERPs that included expert guidance, multidisciplinary teams, data audits, and opportunities for collaboration.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was LOS, and the secondary outcome was serious morbidity or mortality composite.

RESULTS

There were 4975 colectomies performed by 15 ERIN pilot hospitals (3437 before implementation and 1538 after implementation) compared with a control cohort of 9950 colectomies (4726 before implementation and 5224 after implementation). The mean LOS decreased by 1.7 days in the pilot (6.9 [interquartile range (IQR), 4-8] days before implementation vs 5.2 [IQR, 3-6] days after implementation, P < .001) compared with 0.4 day in controls (6.4 [IQR, 4-7] days before implementation vs 6.0 [IQR, 3-7] days after implementation, P < .001). Readmission did not differ pre-post for the pilot or controls. Serious morbidity or mortality decreased for pilot participants (485 [14.1%] before implementation vs 162 [10.5%] after implementation, P < .001), with no difference in controls, and remained significant after risk adjustment (adjusted odds ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.60-0.96). After adjusting for differences in case mix and for clustering in hospitals and matched pairs, the adjusted difference-in-differences model demonstrated a decrease in LOS by 1.1 days in the pilot over controls (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Participating ERIN pilot hospitals achieved shorter LOS and decreased complications after elective colectomy, without increasing readmissions. The ability to implement ERPs across hospitals of varied size and resources is essential. Lessons from the ERIN pilot may inform efforts to scale this effective and evidence-based intervention.

摘要

重要性

增强恢复协议(ERPs)是最佳实践的标准化护理计划,可以降低发病率和住院时间(LOS)。然而,许多医院在实施方面需要帮助。增强恢复国家手术质量改进计划(ERIN)试点旨在支持 ERP 的实施。

目的

评估 ERIN 试点与结肠切除术 LOS 之间的关联。

设计、设置和参与者:使用差异中的差异设计,在分层模型中比较了试点实施前后 ERP 的 LOS,同时调整了病例组合和医院以及匹配对的随机效应。该设置是来自国家手术质量改进计划的 15 家不同规模和学术地位的医院。使用新的 ERIN 变量收集结肠切除术的预实施和后实施病例(2013 年 7 月 1 日至 2015 年 12 月 31 日)。排除急诊和脓毒症病例。倾向评分匹配确定了非 ERIN 医院进行结肠切除术的 2:1 对照队列患者。

干预措施

试点医院制定并实施了包括专家指导、多学科团队、数据审核和合作机会在内的 ERPs。

主要结果和测量

主要结果是 LOS,次要结果是严重发病率或死亡率复合。

结果

与非 ERIN 试点医院的 9950 例结肠切除术(实施前 4726 例,实施后 5224 例)相比,15 家 ERIN 试点医院进行了 4975 例结肠切除术(实施前 3437 例,实施后 1538 例)。试点组 LOS 平均减少 1.7 天(实施前 6.9 [四分位距(IQR),4-8] 天,实施后 5.2 [IQR,3-6] 天,P < .001),对照组减少 0.4 天(实施前 6.4 [IQR,4-7] 天,实施后 6.0 [IQR,3-7] 天,P < .001)。试点组和对照组的再入院率在实施前后均无差异。试点组的严重发病率或死亡率下降(实施前 485 [14.1%],实施后 162 [10.5%],P < .001),对照组无差异,风险调整后仍有显著意义(调整后优势比,0.76;95%CI,0.60-0.96)。在调整病例组合差异以及医院和匹配对的聚类后,调整后的差异差异模型显示试点组的 LOS 比对照组减少 1.1 天(P < .001)。

结论和相关性

参与 ERIN 试点的医院在没有增加再入院率的情况下,实现了选择性结肠切除术的 LOS 缩短和并发症减少。在不同规模和资源的医院实施 ERPs 的能力至关重要。从 ERIN 试点中获得的经验教训可能为扩大这一有效和基于证据的干预措施提供信息。

相似文献

3
Effect of Diagnosis on Outcomes in the Setting of Enhanced Recovery Protocols.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2018 Jul;61(7):847-853. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001102.
4
Adherence to Enhanced Recovery Protocols in NSQIP and Association With Colectomy Outcomes.
Ann Surg. 2019 Mar;269(3):486-493. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002566.
5
Newly implemented enhanced recovery pathway positively impacts hospital length of stay.
Surg Endosc. 2016 Sep;30(9):4019-28. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4714-8. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
6
Association of Frailty and Postoperative Complications With Unplanned Readmissions After Elective Outpatient Surgery.
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 May 3;2(5):e194330. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.4330.
7
Prospective study of colorectal enhanced recovery after surgery in a community hospital.
JAMA Surg. 2014 Sep;149(9):955-61. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.675.
10
Costs and Consequences of Early Hospital Discharge After Major Inpatient Surgery in Older Adults.
JAMA Surg. 2017 May 17;152(5):e170123. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0123.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing a large-scale quality improvement program for thyroid cancer surgery.
World J Surg. 2024 Dec;48(12):2925-2933. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12367. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
3
National Databases for Assessment of Quality.
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2023 Mar 13;36(4):252-258. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1761593. eCollection 2023 Jul.
4
Incorporation of Blood and Fluid Management Within an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocol in Complex Spine Surgery.
Global Spine J. 2024 Mar;14(2):639-646. doi: 10.1177/21925682221120399. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
5
The Pertinent Literature of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Programs: A Bibliometric Approach.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Feb 17;57(2):172. doi: 10.3390/medicina57020172.
6
Clinical and Economic Outcomes of Enhanced Recovery Dissemination in Michigan Hospitals.
Ann Surg. 2021 Aug 1;274(2):199-205. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004726.
7
Enhanced recovery for obese patients undergoing gynecologic cancer surgery.
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Oct;30(10):1595-1602. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001663. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
9
Risk factors for post-discharge venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing colorectal resection: a NSQIP analysis.
Tech Coloproctol. 2018 Dec;22(12):955-964. doi: 10.1007/s10151-018-1909-8. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
10
Combining Surgical Outcomes and Patient Experiences to Evaluate Hospital Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgery Quality.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Sep;23(9):1900-1910. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-4015-3. Epub 2018 Oct 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Postoperative Complications and Hospital Payment: Implications for Achieving Value.
J Am Coll Surg. 2017 May;224(5):779-786e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.01.041. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
2
Uptake of enhanced recovery practices by SAGES members: a survey.
Surg Endosc. 2017 Sep;31(9):3519-3526. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5378-8. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
3
Enhanced Recovery after Elective Colorectal Surgery - Reasons for Non-Compliance with the Protocol.
Dig Surg. 2017;34(3):220-226. doi: 10.1159/000450685. Epub 2016 Dec 10.
5
Factors predicting outcome from enhanced recovery programmes in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a systematic review.
Surg Endosc. 2017 May;31(5):2050-2071. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5205-2. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
7
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) for gastrointestinal surgery, part 2: consensus statement for anaesthesia practice.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2016 Mar;60(3):289-334. doi: 10.1111/aas.12651. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
8
Rethinking Priorities: Cost of Complications After Elective Colectomy.
Ann Surg. 2016 Aug;264(2):312-22. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001511.
9
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) for gastrointestinal surgery, part 1: pathophysiological considerations.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015 Nov;59(10):1212-31. doi: 10.1111/aas.12601. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
10
Improving Outcomes in Colorectal Surgery by Sequential Implementation of Multiple Standardized Care Programs.
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Aug;221(2):404-14.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.04.008. Epub 2015 May 7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验