Suppr超能文献

新型弹性下胫腓联合钩板固定与常规螺钉固定治疗下胫腓联合损伤的对比研究

Novel Elastic Syndesmosis Hook Plate Fixation Versus Routine Screw Fixation for Syndesmosis Injury.

作者信息

Xian Hang, Miao Jianyun, Zhou Qiankun, Lian Kejian, Zhai Wenliang, Liu Qingjun

机构信息

Orthopedist, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Affiliated Southeast Hospital of Xiamen University (The 175th Hospital of People's Liberation Army), Zhangzhou, China.

Professor and Orthopedist, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Affiliated Southeast Hospital of Xiamen University (The 175th Hospital of People's Liberation Army), Zhangzhou, China.

出版信息

J Foot Ankle Surg. 2018 Jan-Feb;57(1):65-68. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.08.007.

Abstract

Unstable external-rotation type ankle fractures with concomitant syndesmosis injury commonly occur. Syndesmosis screw fixation has long been regarded as a reference standard treatment for syndesmosis injury. However, its complications and biomechanical disadvantages have become controversial; thus, we designed a novel elastic syndesmosis hook plate (ESHP) that combines the features of both rigidity and flexibility. The purpose of the present study was to introduce this new method and compare its clinical outcomes with those of routine screw fixation. We randomized 25 patients to the screw fixation group and ESHP group. The average follow-up period was 12 months. The clinical outcomes included malreduction or loss of reduction, overall complications, and function. During the follow-up period, 3 cases (25%) of malreduction were found in screw fixation group on postoperative computed tomography. In the ESHP group, only 1 patient (7.69%) had a narrowed anterior gap between the distal tibia and fibula. However, the difference in the malreduction rate between the 2 groups was not significant statistically (p = .32). The overall complication rate in the ESHP group was lower than that in the screw group, although no significant differences were found between the 2 groups. The mean visual analog scale scores in the ESHP and screw groups were 1.46 ± 1.33 and 2.42 ± 2.07, respectively. The average dorsiflexion range of motion in both groups was satisfactory (14.77° versus 12.83°; p = .16). However, a statistically significant difference was found in the plantarflexion range of motion between the 2 groups (p < .05). In addition, the ESHP group had an earlier time to return to work (p < .05). The ESHP fixation construct can stably fix syndesmosis, retain the physiologic micromotion function of the syndesmosis, and results in fewer complications compared with routine syndesmosis screw fixation for syndesmotic instability. In conclusion, our results have shown ESHP to be a viable method for treatment of syndesmosis instability.

摘要

不稳定外旋型踝关节骨折合并下胫腓联合损伤较为常见。下胫腓联合螺钉固定长期以来一直被视为下胫腓联合损伤的参考标准治疗方法。然而,其并发症和生物力学缺陷已引发争议;因此,我们设计了一种兼具刚性和柔性特点的新型弹性下胫腓联合钩板(ESHP)。本研究的目的是介绍这种新方法,并将其临床结果与常规螺钉固定的结果进行比较。我们将25例患者随机分为螺钉固定组和ESHP组。平均随访期为12个月。临床结果包括复位不良或复位丢失、总体并发症和功能。在随访期间,螺钉固定组术后计算机断层扫描发现3例(25%)复位不良。在ESHP组,只有1例患者(7.69%)胫腓骨远端前间隙变窄。然而,两组复位不良率的差异无统计学意义(p = 0.32)。ESHP组的总体并发症发生率低于螺钉组,尽管两组之间未发现显著差异。ESHP组和螺钉组的平均视觉模拟评分分别为1.46±1.33和2.42±2.07。两组的平均背屈活动范围均令人满意(14.77°对12.83°;p = 0.16)。然而,两组之间的跖屈活动范围存在统计学显著差异(p < 0.05)。此外,ESHP组的复工时间更早(p < 0.05)。与常规下胫腓联合螺钉固定治疗下胫腓联合不稳定相比,ESHP固定结构能够稳定固定下胫腓联合,保留其生理微动功能,且并发症更少。总之,我们的结果表明ESHP是治疗下胫腓联合不稳定的一种可行方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验