Department of Infection and Immunity, Immuno-Pharmacology and Interactomics, Luxembourg Institute of Health (LIH), Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Department of Biochemistry, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Br J Pharmacol. 2018 May;175(9):1419-1438. doi: 10.1111/bph.14132. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
Chemokines and their receptors form an intricate interaction and signalling network that plays critical roles in various physiological and pathological cellular processes. The high promiscuity and apparent redundancy of this network makes probing individual chemokine/receptor interactions and functional effects, as well as targeting individual receptor axes for therapeutic applications, challenging. Despite poor sequence identity, the N-terminal regions of chemokines, which play a key role in their activity and selectivity, contain several conserved features. Thus far little is known regarding the molecular basis of their interactions with typical and atypical chemokine receptors or the conservation of their contributions across chemokine-receptor pairs.
We used a broad panel of chemokine variants and modified peptides derived from the N-terminal region of chemokines CXCL12, CXCL11 and vCCL2, to compare the contributions of various features to binding and activation of their shared receptors, the two typical, canonical G protein-signalling receptors, CXCR4 and CXCR3, as well as the atypical scavenger receptor CXCR7/ACKR3, which shows exclusively arrestin-dependent activity.
We provide molecular insights into the plasticity of the ligand-binding pockets of these receptors, their chemokine binding modes and their activation mechanisms. Although the chemokine N-terminal region is a critical determinant, neither the most proximal residues nor the N-loop are essential for binding and activation of ACKR3, as distinct from binding and activation of CXCR4 and CXCR3.
These results suggest a different interaction mechanism between this atypical receptor and its ligands and illustrate its strong propensity to activation.
趋化因子及其受体形成了一个复杂的相互作用和信号网络,在各种生理和病理细胞过程中发挥着关键作用。该网络的高度混杂性和明显的冗余性使得探测单个趋化因子/受体相互作用和功能效应,以及针对单个受体轴进行治疗应用,具有挑战性。尽管趋化因子的 N 端区域序列同一性较差,但在其活性和选择性中起着关键作用,包含几个保守特征。到目前为止,人们对它们与典型和非典型趋化因子受体相互作用的分子基础,以及它们在趋化因子-受体对中的贡献的保守性知之甚少。
我们使用了广泛的趋化因子变体和源自趋化因子 CXCL12、CXCL11 和 vCCL2 的 N 端区域的修饰肽,来比较各种特征对其共享受体(两个典型的、经典的 G 蛋白信号转导受体,CXCR4 和 CXCR3,以及非典型的清道夫受体 CXCR7/ACKR3,其仅表现出依赖抑制蛋白的活性)的结合和激活的贡献。
我们提供了这些受体配体结合口袋的可塑性、它们的趋化因子结合模式和激活机制的分子见解。尽管趋化因子 N 端区域是一个关键决定因素,但与 CXCR4 和 CXCR3 的结合和激活不同,对于 ACKR3 的结合和激活来说,最接近的残基和 N 环都不是必需的。
这些结果表明了这个非典型受体与其配体之间的不同相互作用机制,并说明了它强烈的激活倾向。