Linder Gustav, Sandin Fredrik, Johansson Jan, Lindblad Mats, Lundell Lars, Hedberg Jakob
Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Regional Cancer Center Sweden, Uppsala, Sweden.
Cancer Epidemiol. 2018 Feb;52:91-98. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2017.12.008. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
Low socioeconomic status and poor education elevate the risk of developing esophageal- and junctional cancer. High education level also increases survival after curative surgery. The present study aimed to investigate associations, if any, between patient education-level and treatment allocation after diagnosis of esophageal- and junctional cancer and its subsequent impact on survival.
A nation-wide cohort study was undertaken. Data from a Swedish national quality register for esophageal cancer (NREV) was linked to the National Cancer Register, National Patient Register, Prescribed Drug Register, Cause of Death Register and educational data from Statistics Sweden. The effect of education level (low; ≤9 years, intermediate; 10-12 years and high >12 years) on the probability of allocation to curative treatment was analyzed with logistic regression. The Kaplan-Meier-method and Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the effect of education on survival.
A total of 4112 patients were included. In a multivariate logistic regression model, high education level was associated with greater probability of allocation to curative treatment (adjusted OR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.08-2.03, p = 0,014) as was adherence to a multidisciplinary treatment-conference (adjusted OR: 3.13, 95% CI: 2.40-4.08, p < 0,001). High education level was associated with improved survival in the patients allocated to curative treatment (HR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.69-0.99, p = 0,036).
In this nation-wide cohort of esophageal- and junctional cancer patients, including data regarding many confounders, high education level was associated with greater probability of being offered curative treatment and improved survival.
社会经济地位低下和教育程度低会增加患食管癌和食管交界癌的风险。高教育水平也会提高根治性手术后的生存率。本研究旨在调查食管癌和食管交界癌诊断后患者教育水平与治疗分配之间的关联(如有)及其对生存的后续影响。
进行了一项全国性队列研究。瑞典国家食管癌质量登记处(NREV)的数据与国家癌症登记处、国家患者登记处、处方药登记处、死亡原因登记处以及瑞典统计局的教育数据相链接。采用逻辑回归分析教育水平(低;≤9年,中等;10 - 12年,高;>12年)对接受根治性治疗概率的影响。采用Kaplan - Meier法和Cox比例风险模型评估教育对生存的影响。
共纳入4112例患者。在多变量逻辑回归模型中,高教育水平与接受根治性治疗的概率更高相关(调整后的OR:1.48,95%CI:1.08 - 2.03,p = 0.014),坚持多学科治疗会议也是如此(调整后的OR:3.13,95%CI:2.40 - 4.08,p < 0.001)。高教育水平与接受根治性治疗患者的生存率提高相关(HR:0.82,95%CI:0.69 - 0.99,p = 0.036)。
在这个包括许多混杂因素数据的全国性食管癌和食管交界癌患者队列中,高教育水平与接受根治性治疗的概率更高以及生存率提高相关。