Rayce Signe B, Rasmussen Ida S, Klest Sihu K, Patras Joshua, Pontoppidan Maiken
Department for Child and Family, VIVE - The Danish Centre of Applied Social Science, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 27;7(12):e015707. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015707.
Infancy is a critical stage of life, and a secure relationship with caring and responsive caregivers is crucial for healthy infant development. Early parenting interventions aim to support families in which infants are at risk of developmental harm. Our objective is to systematically review the effects of parenting interventions on child development and on parent-child relationship for at-risk families with infants aged 0-12 months.
This is a systematic review and meta-analyses. We extracted publications from 10 databases in June 2013, January 2015 and June 2016, and supplemented with grey literature and hand search. We assessed risk of bias, calculated effect sizes and conducted meta-analyses.
(1) Randomised controlled trials of structured psychosocial interventions offered to at-risk families with infants aged 0-12 months in Western Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries, (2) interventions with a minimum of three sessions and at least half of these delivered postnatally and (3) outcomes reported for child development or parent-child relationship.
Sixteen studies were included. Meta-analyses were conducted on seven outcomes represented in 13 studies. Parenting interventions significantly improved child behaviour (=0.14; 95% CI 0.03 to 0.26), parent-child relationship (=0.44; 95% CI 0.09 to 0.80) and maternal sensitivity (=0.46; 95% CI 0.26 to 0.65) postintervention. There were no significant effects on cognitive development (0.13; 95% CI -0.08 to 0.41), internalising behaviour (0.16; 95% CI -0.03 to 0.33) or externalising behaviour (0.16; 95% CI -0.01 to 0.30) post-intervention. At long-term follow-up we found no significant effect on child behaviour (0.15; 95% CI -0.03 to 0.31).
Interventions offered to at-risk families in the first year of the child's life appear to improve child behaviour, parent-child relationship and maternal sensitivity post-intervention, but not child cognitive development and internalising or externalising behaviour. Future studies should incorporate follow-up assessments to examine long-term effects of early interventions.
婴儿期是人生的关键阶段,与关爱且有回应的照料者建立安全的关系对婴儿的健康发育至关重要。早期育儿干预旨在为婴儿有发育受损风险的家庭提供支持。我们的目的是系统评价育儿干预对0至12个月婴儿的高危家庭中儿童发育及亲子关系的影响。
这是一项系统评价和荟萃分析。我们于2013年6月、2015年1月和2016年6月从10个数据库中提取出版物,并辅以灰色文献和手工检索。我们评估偏倚风险,计算效应量并进行荟萃分析。
(1)针对经济合作与发展组织(经合组织)国家中0至12个月婴儿的高危家庭提供的结构化心理社会干预的随机对照试验,(2)干预至少有三次疗程,且其中至少一半在产后进行,以及(3)报告了儿童发育或亲子关系的结果。
纳入16项研究。对13项研究中呈现的7个结果进行了荟萃分析。育儿干预在干预后显著改善了儿童行为(效应量=0.14;95%置信区间0.03至0.26)、亲子关系(效应量=0.44;95%置信区间0.09至0.80)和母亲敏感性(效应量=0.46;95%置信区间0.26至0.65)。对认知发育(效应量0.13;95%置信区间-0.08至0.41)、内化行为(效应量0.16;95%置信区间-0.03至0.33)或外化行为(效应量0.16;95%置信区间-0.01至0.30)在干预后没有显著影响。在长期随访中,我们发现对儿童行为没有显著影响(效应量0.15;95%置信区间-0.03至0.31)。
在儿童生命的第一年为高危家庭提供的干预在干预后似乎改善了儿童行为、亲子关系和母亲敏感性,但对儿童认知发育以及内化或外化行为没有影响。未来的研究应纳入随访评估以检验早期干预的长期效果。