Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Am J Perinatol. 2018 Jul;35(8):703-706. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1617433. Epub 2017 Dec 29.
Clinicians use estimated fetal weight (EFW) as a proxy for birth weight (BW) in the antenatal period. Our objective was to compare the accuracy of EFW obtained by ultrasound to BW among infants born during the periviable period and determine if accuracy of EFW varied among small for gestational age (SGA) versus appropriate for gestational age (AGA) grown neonates.
We included women who delivered between 23 and 25 weeks' gestation and had an EFW within 7 days of delivery. Mean percentage difference and median absolute percentage difference between EFW and BW were calculated.
Our cohort included 226 neonates with a mean gestational age of 24 ± 0.8 weeks and median BW of 653 g (interquartile range [IQR]: 580-750 g). The median absolute percentage difference between EFW and BW of fetal weight estimates was 9.2% (IQR: 3.6-17.2). EFW overestimated BW for 75% ( = 171) of the cohort. Among SGA infants, the mean percentage difference in EFW and BW was 16.2 ± 19.4% versus 6.9% ± 13.1% in AGA infants ( = 0.019).
EFW overestimated BW in this cohort. In addition, ultrasound was less accurate among infants born SGA. These data are important to consider when counseling families facing periviable delivery.
临床医生在产前期间使用估计胎儿体重(EFW)作为出生体重(BW)的替代值。我们的目的是比较围产前期出生婴儿的超声 EFw 与 BW 的准确性,并确定 EFw 在小胎龄儿(SGA)与适宜胎龄儿(AGA)中的准确性是否存在差异。
我们纳入了在 23 至 25 周妊娠期间分娩且在分娩后 7 天内有 EFw 的女性。计算 EFw 与 BW 之间的平均百分比差异和中位数绝对百分比差异。
我们的队列包括 226 名平均胎龄为 24 ± 0.8 周和中位 BW 为 653g(四分位距[IQR]:580-750g)的新生儿。EFw 与 BW 之间的胎儿体重估计中位数绝对百分比差异为 9.2%(IQR:3.6-17.2)。EFw 高估了 75%( = 171)的队列 BW。在 SGA 婴儿中,EFW 与 BW 的平均百分比差异为 16.2 ± 19.4%,而 AGA 婴儿为 6.9 ± 13.1%( = 0.019)。
在本队列中,EFW 高估了 BW。此外,在 SGA 出生的婴儿中,超声的准确性较低。这些数据在为面临围产期分娩的家庭提供咨询时很重要。