Center for Health Policy Science & Tobacco Research, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2019 Jan 1;21(1):55-62. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx279.
Advanced vaping devices likely pose a greater risk to adolescent health than basic or intermediate devices because advanced devices deliver nicotine more effectively and heat e-liquid to higher temperatures, producing more harmful chemical emissions. However, little is known about adolescents' risk factors for using different device types.
We used social media to recruit an online sample of 1508 US adolescents aged 15-17 who reported past 30-day use of electronic vaping products (EVPs) in September 2016. We assessed tobacco use, beliefs, and knowledge about EVPs and EVP use behavior, including the device type participants use most frequently. We used multinomial logistic regression to examine differences between adolescents who usually use intermediate versus basic and advanced versus basic devices.
Most respondents usually used modifiable advanced devices (56.8%) rather than basic "cigalike" (14.5%) or pen-style intermediate (28.7%) devices. Use of multiple device types was common, particularly among those who primarily used basic devices. Younger age and less frequent vaping were associated with mainly using basic devices. Adolescents who were older, male, personally bought their main device, and had ever mixed e-liquids were at elevated risk for usually using advanced devices.
Adolescents who primarily use basic devices may be newer users who are experimenting with multiple devices. Future research should examine which adolescents are most likely to transition to advanced devices in order to develop targeted interventions. Regulators should consider strategies to reduce access to all types of EVPs, such as better enforcement of the current ban on sales to minors.
This research addresses two gaps in research on adolescent electronic vaping product use: (1) characterizing use of advanced devices as distinct from intermediate devices rather than grouping them together and (2) examining factors associated with use of specific device types. This study suggests that there are distinct profiles of adolescents who use primarily basic, intermediate, or advanced devices. Adolescents who most often use basic devices may be new users experimenting with vaping, whereas adolescents who most often use advanced devices appear to be buying devices for themselves and engaging in risky behaviors such as mixing their own e-liquid.
与基本或中级设备相比,高级蒸气设备可能对青少年健康构成更大的风险,因为高级设备更有效地输送尼古丁,并将电子液体加热到更高的温度,从而产生更多有害的化学排放物。然而,对于青少年使用不同设备类型的风险因素知之甚少。
我们利用社交媒体招募了 1508 名年龄在 15 至 17 岁之间的美国青少年,他们在 2016 年 9 月报告了过去 30 天内使用电子烟产品(EVPs)的情况。我们评估了青少年的烟草使用情况、对电子烟的看法和了解程度,以及包括他们最常使用的设备类型在内的电子烟使用行为。我们使用多项逻辑回归分析来研究通常使用中级设备而非基本“雪茄型”(14.5%)或笔式中级设备(28.7%)的青少年与通常使用高级设备和基本设备的青少年之间的差异。
大多数受访者通常使用可调节的高级设备(56.8%),而不是基本的“雪茄型”(14.5%)或笔式中级(28.7%)设备。使用多种设备类型很常见,尤其是那些主要使用基本设备的人。年龄较小和较少的蒸气使用与主要使用基本设备有关。年龄较大、男性、个人购买主要设备以及曾经混合过电子烟液体的青少年,使用高级设备的风险较高。
主要使用基本设备的青少年可能是新用户,他们正在尝试使用多种设备。未来的研究应该检查哪些青少年最有可能过渡到高级设备,以便制定有针对性的干预措施。监管机构应考虑采取策略来减少所有类型的电子烟的使用,例如更好地执行目前禁止向未成年人销售电子烟的规定。
本研究解决了青少年电子烟产品使用研究中的两个空白:(1)将高级设备与中级设备区分开来,而不是将它们归为一类;(2)研究与特定设备类型使用相关的因素。这项研究表明,有不同的青少年群体使用基本、中级或高级设备。主要使用基本设备的青少年可能是新用户,他们正在尝试电子烟,而主要使用高级设备的青少年似乎是为自己购买设备,并从事混合自己的电子烟液体等危险行为。