Department of Anesthesiology and Resuscitology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.
Department of Pharmacology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.
Crit Care Med. 2018 Apr;46(4):570-576. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002947.
Many biomarkers for sepsis are used in clinical practice; however, few have become the standard. We measured plasma histidine-rich glycoprotein levels in patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome. We compared histidine-rich glycoprotein, procalcitonin, and presepsin levels to assess their significance as biomarkers.
Single-center, prospective, observational cohort study.
ICU at an university-affiliated hospital.
Seventy-nine ICU patients (70 with systemic inflammatory response syndrome and 9 without systemic inflammatory response syndrome) and 16 healthy volunteers.
None.
We collected blood samples from patients within 24 hours of ICU admission. Histidine-rich glycoprotein levels were determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The median histidine-rich glycoprotein level in healthy volunteers (n = 16) was 63.00 µg/mL (interquartile range, 51.53-66.21 µg/mL). Histidine-rich glycoprotein levels in systemic inflammatory response syndrome patients (n = 70; 28.72 µg/mL [15.74-41.46 µg/mL]) were lower than those in nonsystemic inflammatory response syndrome patients (n = 9; 38.64 µg/mL [30.26-51.81 µg/mL]; p = 0.049). Of 70 patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome, 20 had sepsis. Histidine-rich glycoprotein levels were lower in septic patients than in noninfective systemic inflammatory response syndrome patients (8.71 µg/mL [6.72-15.74 µg/mL] vs 33.27 µg/mL [26.57-44.99 µg/mL]; p < 0.001) and were lower in nonsurvivors (n = 8) than in survivors (n = 62) of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (9.06 µg/mL [4.49-15.70 µg/mL] vs 31.78 µg/mL [18.57-42.11 µg/mL]; p < 0.001). Histidine-rich glycoprotein showed a high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing sepsis. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for detecting sepsis within systemic inflammatory response syndrome patients showed that the area under the curve for histidine-rich glycoprotein, procalcitonin, and presepsin was 0.97, 0.82, and 0.77, respectively. In addition, survival analysis in systemic inflammatory response syndrome patients revealed that the Harrell C-index for histidine-rich glycoprotein, procalcitonin, and presepsin was 0.85, 0.65, and 0.87, respectively.
Histidine-rich glycoprotein levels were low in patients with sepsis and were significantly related to mortality in systemic inflammatory response syndrome population. Furthermore, as a biomarker, histidine-rich glycoprotein may be superior to procalcitonin and presepsin.
许多脓毒症的生物标志物在临床上得到应用,但很少有成为标准的。我们测量了全身炎症反应综合征患者的血浆组氨酸丰富糖蛋白水平。我们比较了组氨酸丰富糖蛋白、降钙素原和前降钙素水平,以评估它们作为生物标志物的意义。
单中心、前瞻性、观察性队列研究。
大学附属医院的 ICU。
79 名 ICU 患者(70 名全身炎症反应综合征患者和 9 名非全身炎症反应综合征患者)和 16 名健康志愿者。
无。
我们在 ICU 入院后 24 小时内从患者身上采集血样。使用酶联免疫吸附试验测定组氨酸丰富糖蛋白水平。16 名健康志愿者(n = 16)的中位组氨酸丰富糖蛋白水平为 63.00 µg/mL(四分位距,51.53-66.21 µg/mL)。全身炎症反应综合征患者(n = 70;28.72 µg/mL[15.74-41.46 µg/mL])的组氨酸丰富糖蛋白水平低于非全身炎症反应综合征患者(n = 9;38.64 µg/mL[30.26-51.81 µg/mL];p = 0.049)。在 70 名全身炎症反应综合征患者中,有 20 名患有脓毒症。脓毒症患者的组氨酸丰富糖蛋白水平低于非感染性全身炎症反应综合征患者(8.71 µg/mL[6.72-15.74 µg/mL]与 33.27 µg/mL[26.57-44.99 µg/mL];p < 0.001),且在全身炎症反应综合征的死亡患者(n = 8)中低于存活患者(n = 62)(9.06 µg/mL[4.49-15.70 µg/mL]与 31.78 µg/mL[18.57-42.11 µg/mL];p < 0.001)。组氨酸丰富糖蛋白对脓毒症的诊断具有较高的灵敏度和特异性。在全身炎症反应综合征患者中检测脓毒症的受试者工作特征曲线分析显示,组氨酸丰富糖蛋白、降钙素原和前降钙素的曲线下面积分别为 0.97、0.82 和 0.77。此外,全身炎症反应综合征患者的生存分析显示,组氨酸丰富糖蛋白、降钙素原和前降钙素的 Harrell C 指数分别为 0.85、0.65 和 0.87。
脓毒症患者的组氨酸丰富糖蛋白水平较低,与全身炎症反应综合征患者的死亡率显著相关。此外,作为一种生物标志物,组氨酸丰富糖蛋白可能优于降钙素原和前降钙素。