Suppr超能文献

艺术还是科学?基于证据的人类面部美学方法——迈向明智临床美学实践的定量分析

Art or Science? An Evidence-Based Approach to Human Facial Beauty a Quantitative Analysis Towards an Informed Clinical Aesthetic Practice.

作者信息

Harrar Harpal, Myers Simon, Ghanem Ali M

机构信息

Academic Plastic Surgery Group, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, 4 Newark Street, London, E1 2AT, UK.

出版信息

Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018 Feb;42(1):137-146. doi: 10.1007/s00266-017-1032-7. Epub 2018 Jan 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients often seek guidance from the aesthetic practitioners regarding treatments to enhance their 'beauty'. Is there a science behind the art of assessment and if so is it measurable? Through the centuries, this question has challenged scholars, artists and surgeons.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

This study aims to undertake a review of the evidence behind quantitative facial measurements in assessing beauty to help the practitioner in everyday aesthetic practice.

METHODS

A Medline, Embase search for beauty, facial features and quantitative analysis was undertaken.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Inclusion criteria were studies on adults, and exclusions included studies undertaken for dental, cleft lip, oncology, burns or reconstructive surgeries. The abstracts and papers were appraised, and further studies excluded that were considered inappropriate. The data were extracted using a standardised table. The final dataset was appraised in accordance with the PRISMA checklist and Holland and Rees' critique tools.

RESULTS

Of the 1253 studies screened, 1139 were excluded from abstracts and a further 70 excluded from full text articles. The remaining 44 were assessed qualitatively and quantitatively. It became evident that the datasets were not comparable. Nevertheless, common themes were obvious, and these were summarised.

CONCLUSION

Despite measures of the beauty of individual components to the sum of all the parts, such as symmetry and the golden ratio, we are yet far from establishing what truly constitutes quantitative beauty. Perhaps beauty is truly in the 'eyes of the beholder' (and perhaps in the eyes of the subject too).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

摘要

背景

患者经常就提升自身“美丽”的治疗方法向美容从业者寻求指导。评估艺术背后是否存在科学依据?如果有,它是否可以衡量?几个世纪以来,这个问题一直困扰着学者、艺术家和外科医生。

目的

本研究旨在回顾定量面部测量在评估美丽方面的证据,以帮助从业者在日常美容实践中应用。

方法

对Medline、Embase数据库进行关于美丽、面部特征和定量分析的检索。

入选标准

纳入标准为针对成年人的研究,排除标准包括牙科、唇裂、肿瘤学、烧伤或重建手术方面的研究。对摘要和论文进行评估,并排除进一步认为不合适的研究。使用标准化表格提取数据。最终数据集根据PRISMA清单以及霍兰德和里斯的批判工具进行评估。

结果

在筛选的1253项研究中,1139项从摘要中被排除,另有70项从全文文章中被排除。其余44项进行了定性和定量评估。很明显,这些数据集不可比。然而,共同主题很明显,并进行了总结。

结论

尽管对单个组成部分的美以及所有部分的总和进行了测量,如对称性和黄金比例,但我们距离确定真正构成定量美的因素仍有很大差距。也许美真的“在旁观者眼中”(也许也在受试者眼中)。

证据水平V:本杂志要求作者为每篇文章指定证据水平。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参考目录或在线作者指南www.springer.com/00266

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dfa/5786654/2894f19b3ef2/266_2017_1032_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验