Suppr超能文献

利用实地数据定量评估化学物质对野生动物种群生存力的影响。

Using field data to quantify chemical impacts on wildlife population viability.

机构信息

Department of Environmental Science, Institute for Wetland and Water Research, Faculty of Science, Radboud University Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9010, NL-6500 GL, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Ecol Appl. 2018 Apr;28(3):771-785. doi: 10.1002/eap.1685.

Abstract

Environmental pollution is an important driver of biodiversity loss. Yet, to date, the effects of chemical exposure on wildlife populations have been quantified for only a few species, mainly due to a lack of appropriate laboratory data to quantify chemical impacts on vital rates. In this study, we developed a method to quantify the effects of toxicant exposure on wildlife population persistence based on field monitoring data. We established field-based vital-rate-response functions for toxicants, using quantile regression to correct for the influences of confounding factors on the vital rates observed, and combined the response curves with population viability modelling. We then applied the method to quantify the impact of DDE on three bird species: the White-tailed Eagle, Bald Eagle, and Osprey. Population viability was expressed via five population extinction vulnerability metrics: population growth rate (r ), critical patch size (CPS), minimum viable population size (MVP), probability of population extirpation (PE), and median time to population extirpation (MTE). We found that past DDE exposure concentrations increased population extirpation vulnerabilities of all three bird species. For example, at DDE concentrations of 25 mg/kg wet mass of egg (the maximum historic exposure concentration reported in literature for the Osprey), r became small (White-tailed Eagle and Osprey) or close to zero (Bald Eagle), the CPS increased up to almost the size of Connecticut (White-tailed Eagle and Osprey) or West Virginia (Bald Eagle), the MVP increased up to approximately 90 (White-tailed Eagle and Osprey) or 180 breeding pairs (Bald Eagle), the PE increased up to almost certain extirpation (Bald Eagle) or only slightly elevated levels (White-tailed Eagle and Osprey) and the MTE became within decades (Bald Eagle) or remained longer than a millennium (White-tailed Eagle and Osprey). Our study provides a method to derive species-specific field-based response curves of toxicant exposure, which can be used to assess population extinction vulnerabilities and obtain critical levels of toxicant exposure based on maximum permissible effect levels. This may help conservation managers to better design appropriate habitat restoration and population recovery measures, such as reducing toxicant levels, increasing the area of suitable habitat or reintroducing individuals.

摘要

环境污染是生物多样性丧失的一个重要驱动因素。然而,迄今为止,由于缺乏适当的实验室数据来量化化学物质对关键生活率的影响,只有少数几种物种的化学暴露对野生动物种群的影响得到了量化。在这项研究中,我们开发了一种方法,基于野外监测数据来量化有毒物质暴露对野生动物种群持续生存的影响。我们为有毒物质建立了基于现场的关键生活率响应函数,使用分位数回归来纠正对观察到的关键生活率有影响的混杂因素,并将响应曲线与种群生存力模型相结合。然后,我们应用该方法量化了 DDE 对三种鸟类的影响:白头海雕、白头鹰和鱼鹰。种群生存力通过五个种群灭绝脆弱性指标来表示:种群增长率 (r)、临界斑块大小 (CPS)、最小可行种群大小 (MVP)、种群灭绝概率 (PE) 和种群灭绝中位数时间 (MTE)。我们发现,过去 DDE 暴露浓度增加了所有三种鸟类的种群灭绝脆弱性。例如,在 DDE 浓度为 25 毫克/公斤湿重卵(文献中报告的鱼鹰最大历史暴露浓度)时,r 变得很小(白头海雕和鱼鹰)或接近零(白头鹰),CPS 增加到几乎康涅狄格州的大小(白头海雕和鱼鹰)或西弗吉尼亚州的大小(白头鹰),MVP 增加到大约 90(白头海雕和鱼鹰)或 180 个繁殖对(白头鹰),PE 增加到几乎灭绝(白头鹰)或仅略有升高(白头海雕和鱼鹰),MTE 在几十年内(白头鹰)或超过一千年(白头海雕和鱼鹰)内。我们的研究提供了一种方法来推导特定物种的有毒物质暴露现场响应曲线,该方法可用于评估种群灭绝脆弱性,并根据最大允许效应水平获得有毒物质暴露的临界水平。这可能有助于保护管理人员更好地设计适当的栖息地恢复和种群恢复措施,例如降低有毒物质水平、增加适宜栖息地面积或重新引入个体。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验