Hanna K L, Rowe F J
Department of Health Services Research, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Neuroophthalmology. 2017 Jul 6;41(6):297-305. doi: 10.1080/01658107.2017.1337159. eCollection 2017 Dec.
The aim of this study was to identify which treatments for post-stroke visual impairment have a supportive evidence base, and which are being used in practice without supportive evidence. A systematic review of the literature reporting on the available treatment options was compared against the visual treatments used in the Vision In Stroke (VIS) study. Treatments were identified for visual field, visual neglect, visual perception and ocular motility disorders. Visual scanning therapies for hemianopia and neglect have an established evidence base. However, a number, such as typoscopes and advice options, have limited detail of their effectiveness and require further research.
本研究的目的是确定哪些针对中风后视力障碍的治疗方法有确凿的证据支持,哪些在实际应用中缺乏证据支持。我们将对现有治疗选择的文献进行系统综述,并与中风视力(VIS)研究中使用的视力治疗方法进行比较。确定了针对视野、视觉忽视、视觉感知和眼球运动障碍的治疗方法。针对偏盲和忽视的视觉扫描疗法有确凿的证据支持。然而,一些方法,如打字镜和建议选项,其有效性的细节有限,需要进一步研究。