Spehar Daniel D, Wolf Peter J
Independent Researcher, 4758 Ridge Road, #409, Cleveland, OH 44144, USA.
Best Friends Animal Society, 5001 Angel Canyon Road, Kanab, UT 84741, USA.
Animals (Basel). 2018 Jan 18;8(1):14. doi: 10.3390/ani8010014.
The use of trap-neuter-return (TNR) as a method of managing free-roaming cat populations has increased in the United States in recent decades. Historically, TNR has been conducted most often at a grassroots level, which has led to inconsistent data collection and assessment practices. Consequently, a paucity of analyzable data exists. An initiative is underway to standardize TNR program data collection and assessment. However, it could be some time before scientifically sound protocols are implemented on a broad scale. In the interim, sets of data collected by nascent citizen scientists offer valid opportunities to evaluate grassroots TNR programs. The purpose of the present study was to examine the effectiveness of a TNR program conducted by a citizen scientist located in Chicago, Illinois, where a county law permitting TNR was enacted in 2007. Colony populations, when grouped by the number of years enrolled in the program, declined by a mean of 54% from entry and 82% from peak levels. Results from coexistent TNR programs in the Chicago area are consistent with these findings.
近几十年来,在美国,诱捕-绝育-放归(TNR)作为一种管理自由放养猫群数量的方法,其应用有所增加。从历史上看,TNR大多在基层开展,这导致数据收集和评估做法不一致。因此,可分析的数据匮乏。目前正在开展一项倡议,以规范TNR项目的数据收集和评估。然而,要在广泛范围内实施科学合理的方案可能还需要一些时间。在此期间,新兴公民科学家收集的数据集为评估基层TNR项目提供了有效的机会。本研究的目的是检验伊利诺伊州芝加哥市一位公民科学家开展的TNR项目的有效性,该郡于2007年颁布了允许TNR的法律。按参与该项目的年数分组时,猫群数量从进入项目时平均下降了54%,从峰值水平下降了82%。芝加哥地区同时开展的TNR项目的结果与这些发现一致。