Suppr超能文献

评估系统映射方法在识别患者安全风险中的应用

Evaluation of system mapping approaches in identifying patient safety risks.

作者信息

Simsekler Mecit Can Emre, Ward James R, Clarkson P John

机构信息

Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi Campus, Abu Dhabi 127788, United Arab Emirates.

School of Management, University College London, 1 Canada Square, London E14 5AA, UK.

出版信息

Int J Qual Health Care. 2018 Apr 1;30(3):227-233. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx176.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

While many system mapping approaches (SMAs) have been broadly used in safety-critical industries, few have so far been employed in the healthcare field to assist in the identification of patient safety risks. In this study, we evaluated a set of system modelling approaches to assess their potential contribution to the identification of risks affecting patient safety. The aim was to gain a greater understanding of the practical application of system modelling approaches with the help of the risk categorization framework developed in this study.

SETTING

We conducted this study in a newly established Adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) service at Cambridge and Peterborough Foundation Trust.

STUDY PARTICIPANTS

Eight key stakeholders of the chosen service, including clinicians, managers and administrative staff, were individually asked to evaluate a set of pre-defined six SMAs according to their usefulness in identifying patient safety risks through interview-based questionnaires.

RESULTS

It was found that each SMA could be useful in the chosen healthcare service in different ways. Further, specific types of diagrams were selected by stakeholders as more useful than others in identifying different sources of risks within the given system.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the evaluation showed that the system diagram is the most useful SMA in risk identification within the given system, while limited time, resources and experience of stakeholders with SMAs may present possible obstacles for their potential use in the healthcare field in future.

摘要

目的

虽然许多系统映射方法(SMA)已在安全关键行业中广泛使用,但迄今为止,在医疗保健领域中使用这些方法来协助识别患者安全风险的情况却很少。在本研究中,我们评估了一组系统建模方法,以评估它们对识别影响患者安全的风险的潜在贡献。目的是借助本研究中开发的风险分类框架,更深入地了解系统建模方法的实际应用。

背景

我们在剑桥和彼得伯勒基金会信托基金新设立的成人注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)服务部门进行了这项研究。

研究参与者

所选服务的八位关键利益相关者,包括临床医生、管理人员和行政人员,被分别要求通过基于访谈的问卷,根据他们在识别患者安全风险方面的有用性,对一组预先定义的六种系统映射方法进行评估。

结果

发现每种系统映射方法在所选的医疗服务中都能以不同方式发挥作用。此外,利益相关者选择了特定类型的图表,认为它们在识别给定系统内不同风险源方面比其他图表更有用。

结论

评估结果表明,系统图是在给定系统中进行风险识别时最有用的系统映射方法,而利益相关者使用系统映射方法的时间、资源和经验有限,可能会成为其未来在医疗领域潜在应用的障碍。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of system mapping approaches in identifying patient safety risks.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2018 Apr 1;30(3):227-233. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx176.
2
Evaluating inputs of failure modes and effects analysis in identifying patient safety risks.
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2019 Feb 11;32(1):191-207. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-12-2017-0233.
5
Leadership walkrounds in mental health care.
Nurs Times. 2014;110(23):21-3.
6
Promoting patient safety through prospective risk identification: example from peri-operative care.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Feb;19(1):69-73. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2008.028050.
9
Modeling Pathology Workload and Complexity to Manage Risks and Improve Patient Quality and Safety.
Risk Anal. 2020 Feb;40(2):421-434. doi: 10.1111/risa.13393. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
10
The link between healthcare risk identification and patient safety culture.
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2019 Apr 15;32(3):574-587. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-04-2018-0098.

引用本文的文献

1
The Triple-E Model: Advancing Equestrian Research with Perspectives from One Health.
Animals (Basel). 2023 Aug 16;13(16):2642. doi: 10.3390/ani13162642.
2
Care transition of trauma patients: Processes with articulation work before and after handoff.
Appl Ergon. 2022 Jan;98:103606. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103606. Epub 2021 Oct 9.
3
Risk Management Assessments and Recommendations Among Students, Staffs, and Health Care Workers in Educational Biomedical Laboratories.
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Jan 15;14:185-198. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S278162. eCollection 2021.
4
Evaluation of System Modelling Techniques for Waste Identification in Lean Healthcare Applications.
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Jan 5;13:3235-3243. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S283189. eCollection 2020.
5
Risk Management in Executive Levels of Healthcare Organizations: Insights from a Scoping Review (2018).
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2020 Mar 19;13:215-243. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S231712. eCollection 2020.
6
Work system barriers and facilitators in inpatient care transitions of pediatric trauma patients.
Appl Ergon. 2020 May;85:103059. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103059. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
7
Assessment of patient safety measures in governmental hospitals in Al-Baha, Saudi Arabia.
AIMS Public Health. 2019 Oct 15;6(4):396-404. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2019.4.396. eCollection 2019.
9
Systems, design and value-for-money in the NHS: mission impossible?
Future Healthc J. 2018 Oct;5(3):156-159. doi: 10.7861/futurehosp.5-3-156.
10
Evaluating inputs of failure modes and effects analysis in identifying patient safety risks.
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2019 Feb 11;32(1):191-207. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-12-2017-0233.

本文引用的文献

1
Trust-level risk identification guidance in the NHS East of England.
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2015;27(2):67-76. doi: 10.3233/JRS-150651.
4
'Global trigger tool' shows that adverse events in hospitals may be ten times greater than previously measured.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Apr;30(4):581-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0190.
5
Temporal trends in rates of patient harm resulting from medical care.
N Engl J Med. 2010 Nov 25;363(22):2124-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1004404.
8
Health care process modelling: which method when?
Int J Qual Health Care. 2009 Jun;21(3):214-24. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzp016. Epub 2009 Apr 10.
10
Work system design for patient safety: the SEIPS model.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Dec;15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i50-8. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.015842.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验