Philips Prejesh, Kooby David A, Maithel Shishir, Merchant Nipun B, Weber Sharon M, Winslow Emily R, Ahmad Syed, Kim Hong J, Scoggins Charles R, McMasters Kelly M, Martin Robert C G
Pancreas. 2018 Mar;47(3):326-331. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000990.
To measure the usefulness of Ki-67 proliferative index (Ki-67 index) as a prognostic variable for grading pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.
A multi-institutional prospective database comprising 350 patients. Grading based on mitotic activity (<2 mitoses/10 high-power fields, 2-20 and >20) and Ki-67 index (<3% per 10 high-power fields, 3%-20% and >20%). Final grade selected based on higher grade of either variable.
Most patients were in the less than 3% (n = 158) and 3% to 20% Ki-67 category (n = 107), with a minority being high-grade (Ki-67 > 20%, n = 27). Discordance between Ki-67 and mitotic rate was noted in 58 patients. On multivariate analysis, final-grade (grade 2: P = 0.010, hazard ratio [HR], 1.2; grade 3: P = 0.002; HR, 2.8), Ki-67, mitotic rate, and lymph node status were significant prognostic markers for overall survival (OS). For disease-free survival (DFS), only final-grade (grade 2: P = 0.05; HR, 1.4; grade 3: P = 0.009; HR, 2.3), Ki-67, mitotic rate, and margin status significantly predicted DFS. Ki-67 was a better model for OS and mitotic rate for DFS. Overall combined final grade was the best model based on HR.
Ki-67 is a strong prognostic factor for OS and DFS and should be included in all pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor pathology.
评估Ki-67增殖指数(Ki-67指数)作为胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤分级的预后变量的效用。
一个多机构前瞻性数据库纳入了350例患者。根据有丝分裂活性(<2个有丝分裂/10个高倍视野、2 - 20个和>20个)和Ki-67指数(每10个高倍视野<3%、3% - 20%和>20%)进行分级。最终分级根据两个变量中较高的等级来选择。
大多数患者处于Ki-67<3%组(n = 158)和3% - 20%组(n = 107),少数为高级别(Ki-67>20%,n = 27)。58例患者的Ki-67与有丝分裂率之间存在不一致。多因素分析显示,最终分级(2级:P = 0.010,风险比[HR],1.2;3级:P = 0.002;HR,2.8)、Ki-67、有丝分裂率和淋巴结状态是总生存期(OS)的显著预后标志物。对于无病生存期(DFS),只有最终分级(2级:P = 0.05;HR,1.4;3级:P = 0.009;HR,2.3)、Ki-67、有丝分裂率和切缘状态显著预测DFS。Ki-67是OS的较好模型,有丝分裂率是DFS的较好模型。基于HR,总体综合最终分级是最佳模型。
Ki-67是OS和DFS的强有力预后因素,应纳入所有胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤的病理检查中。