Suppr超能文献

按疾病分组的药物治疗不依从的经济影响:一项系统综述。

Economic impact of medication non-adherence by disease groups: a systematic review.

作者信息

Cutler Rachelle Louise, Fernandez-Llimos Fernando, Frommer Michael, Benrimoj Charlie, Garcia-Cardenas Victoria

机构信息

Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Department of Social Pharmacy Faculty of Pharmacy, Research Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 21;8(1):e016982. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016982.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the economic impact of medication non-adherence across multiple disease groups.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed and Scopus in September 2017. Studies quantifying the cost of medication non-adherence in relation to economic impact were included. Relevant information was extracted and quality assessed using the Drummond checklist.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine individual studies assessing the cost of medication non-adherence across 14 disease groups were included. Wide-scoping cost variations were reported, with lower levels of adherence generally associated with higher total costs. The annual adjusted disease-specific economic cost of non-adherence per person ranged from $949 to $44 190 (in 2015 US$). Costs attributed to 'all causes' non-adherence ranged from $5271 to $52 341. Medication possession ratio was the metric most used to calculate patient adherence, with varying cut-off points defining non-adherence. The main indicators used to measure the cost of non-adherence were total cost or total healthcare cost (83% of studies), pharmacy costs (70%), inpatient costs (46%), outpatient costs (50%), emergency department visit costs (27%), medical costs (29%) and hospitalisation costs (18%). Drummond quality assessment yielded 10 studies of high quality with all studies performing partial economic evaluations to varying extents.

CONCLUSION

Medication non-adherence places a significant cost burden on healthcare systems. Current research assessing the economic impact of medication non-adherence is limited and of varying quality, failing to provide adaptable data to influence health policy. The correlation between increased non-adherence and higher disease prevalence should be used to inform policymakers to help circumvent avoidable costs to the healthcare system. Differences in methods make the comparison among studies challenging and an accurate estimation of true magnitude of the cost impossible. Standardisation of the metric measures used to estimate medication non-adherence and development of a streamlined approach to quantify costs is required.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42015027338.

摘要

目的

确定多种疾病组中药物治疗不依从的经济影响。

设计

系统评价。

证据综述

2017年9月在PubMed和Scopus中进行了全面的文献检索。纳入了量化药物治疗不依从成本与经济影响相关的研究。使用德拉蒙德清单提取相关信息并进行质量评估。

结果

纳入了79项评估14个疾病组中药物治疗不依从成本的个体研究。报告了广泛的成本差异范围,依从性较低通常与总成本较高相关。每人每年因特定疾病的药物治疗不依从调整后的经济成本从949美元到44190美元不等(2015年美元)。归因于“所有原因”的不依从成本从5271美元到52341美元不等。药物持有率是计算患者依从性最常用的指标,定义不依从的切点各不相同。用于衡量不依从成本的主要指标是总成本或总医疗成本(83%的研究)、药房成本(70%)、住院成本(46%)、门诊成本(50%)、急诊科就诊成本(27%)、医疗成本(29%)和住院费用(18%)。德拉蒙德质量评估产生了10项高质量研究,所有研究都在不同程度上进行了部分经济评估。

结论

药物治疗不依从给医疗保健系统带来了巨大的成本负担。目前评估药物治疗不依从经济影响的研究有限且质量参差不齐,未能提供可用于影响卫生政策的适应性数据。不依从增加与疾病患病率上升之间的相关性应用于告知政策制定者,以帮助规避医疗保健系统中可避免的成本。方法上的差异使得研究之间的比较具有挑战性,并且无法准确估计成本的真实规模。需要对用于估计药物治疗不依从的指标进行标准化,并开发一种简化的方法来量化成本。

PROSPERO注册号:CRD42015027338。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8673/5780689/0c3b6ea8b252/bmjopen-2017-016982f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验