Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, Canada.
Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Brain. 2018 Mar 1;141(3):731-743. doi: 10.1093/brain/awx383.
Simultaneous scalp EEG/functional MRI measures non-invasively haemodynamic responses to interictal epileptic discharges, which are related to the epileptogenic zone. High frequency oscillations are also an excellent indicator of this zone, but are primarily recorded from intracerebral EEG. We studied the spatial overlap of these two important markers in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy to assess if their combination could help better define the extent of the epileptogenic zone. We included patients who underwent EEG-functional MRI and later intracerebral EEG. Based on intracerebral EEG findings, we separated patients with unifocal seizures from patients with multifocal or unknown onset seizures. Haemodynamic t-maps were coregistered with the intracerebral electrode positions. Each EEG channel was classified as pertaining to one of the following categories: primary haemodynamic cluster (maximum t-value), secondary cluster (t-value > 90% of the primary cluster) or outside the primary and secondary clusters. We marked high frequency oscillations (ripples: 80-250 Hz; fast ripples: 250-500 Hz) during 1 h of slow wave sleep, and compared their rates in each haemodynamic category. After classifying channels as high- or low-rate, the proportion of high-rate channels within the primary or primary plus secondary clusters was compared to the proportion expected by chance. Twenty-five patients, 11 with unifocal and 14 with multifocal/unknown seizure onsets, were studied. We found a significantly higher median high frequency oscillation rate in the primary cluster compared to secondary cluster and outside these two clusters for the unifocal group (P < 0.0001), but not for the multifocal/unknown group. For the unifocal group, the number of high-rate channels within the primary or primary plus secondary clusters was significantly higher than expected by chance. This held only for the high-ripple-rate channels in the multifocal/unknown group. At the patient level, most patients (18/25, or 72%) had at least one high-rate channel within a primary cluster. In patients with unifocal epilepsy, the maximum haemodynamic response (primary cluster) related to scalp interictal discharges overlaps with the tissue generating high frequency oscillations at high rates. If intracranial EEG is warranted, this response should be explored. As a tentative clinical use of the combination of these techniques we propose that higher high frequency oscillation rates inside than outside the maximum response indicates that the patient has indeed a focal epileptogenic zone demarcated by this response, whereas similar rates inside and outside may indicate a widespread epileptogenic zone or an epileptogenic zone not covered by the implantation.
头皮 EEG/功能磁共振成像同步测量癫痫发作间期放电的血流动力学反应,这与致痫区有关。高频振荡也是该区域的一个极好指标,但主要从颅内 EEG 记录。我们研究了耐药性癫痫患者这两种重要标志物的空间重叠,以评估它们的组合是否有助于更好地定义致痫区的范围。我们纳入了接受 EEG-功能磁共振成像和随后颅内 EEG 的患者。根据颅内 EEG 结果,我们将局灶性发作患者与多灶性或未知起病发作患者分开。血流动力学 t 图与颅内电极位置配准。每个 EEG 通道分为以下类别之一:主要血流动力学簇(最大 t 值)、次要簇(t 值>主要簇的 90%)或主要和次要簇之外。我们在慢波睡眠期间标记了 1 小时的高频振荡(棘波:80-250 Hz;快棘波:250-500 Hz),并比较了它们在每个血流动力学类别的频率。对通道进行高或低频率分类后,比较主要或主要加次要簇内高频率通道的比例与随机预期的比例。对 25 名患者进行了研究,其中 11 名患者为局灶性,14 名患者为多灶性/未知起病。我们发现,局灶性组的原发性簇的高频振荡率中位数明显高于继发性簇和这两个簇之外(P<0.0001),但多灶性/未知组则不然。对于局灶性组,主要或主要加次要簇内的高频率通道数量明显高于随机预期。对于多灶性/未知组的高棘波率通道,情况也是如此。在患者水平上,大多数患者(25 名中的 18 名,即 72%)在原发性簇内至少有一个高频率通道。在局灶性癫痫患者中,头皮癫痫发作间期放电相关的最大血流动力学反应(原发性簇)与高频振荡的产生重叠,其频率较高。如果需要颅内 EEG,应探索该反应。作为这些技术组合的临床应用的一种尝试,我们建议,最大反应内的高频振荡率高于最大反应外的高频振荡率表明患者确实有一个由该反应界定的局灶性致痫区,而内外相似的率可能表明一个广泛的致痫区或一个未被植入物覆盖的致痫区。