Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Department of General Practice, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Department of General Practice, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
Diabetes Care. 2018 Apr;41(4):688-695. doi: 10.2337/dc17-1194. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
We assessed both from a patient and provider perspective the usefulness and added value of a consultation model that facilitates person-centered diabetes care.
The model consists of ) inventory of disease and patient-related factors; ) setting personal goals; ) choosing treatment; and ) determination of required care. It was implemented in 47 general practices and 6 hospital outpatient clinics. Providers were trained, and patients were recommended to prepare their visit. All filled out a questionnaire after every consultation. Differences between primary and secondary care practices and between physician-led and nurse-led consultations were analyzed.
Seventy-four physicians and thirty-one nurses participated, reporting on 1,366 consultations with type 2 diabetes patients. According to providers, the model was applicable in 72.4% (nurses 79.3% vs. physicians 68.5%, < 0.001). Physicians more often had a consultation time <25 min (80.4% vs. 56.9%, < 0.001). According to providers, two of three patients spoke more than half of the consultation time (outpatient clinics 75.2% vs. general practices 66.6%, = 0.002; nurses 73.2% vs. physicians 64.4%, = 0.001). Providers stated that person-related factors often determined treatment goals. Almost all patients (94.4%) reported that they made shared decisions; they felt more involved than before (with physicians 45.1% vs. with nurses 33.6%, < 0.001) and rated the consultation 8.6 of 10. After physician-led consultations, 52.5% reported that the consultation was better than before (nurse visit 33.7%, < 0.001).
A consultation model to facilitate person-centered care seems well applicable and results in more patient involvement, including shared decision making, and is appreciated by a substantial number of patients.
从患者和提供者的角度评估一种促进以患者为中心的糖尿病护理的咨询模式的有用性和附加值。
该模式包括:)疾病和患者相关因素的清单;)设定个人目标;)选择治疗方法;)确定所需的护理。它在 47 家普通诊所和 6 家医院门诊实施。对提供者进行了培训,并建议患者准备就诊。每次就诊后,所有患者都填写了一份问卷。分析了初级保健和二级保健实践之间以及医生主导和护士主导的咨询之间的差异。
74 名医生和 31 名护士参与,报告了 1366 例 2 型糖尿病患者的咨询。根据提供者的说法,该模型适用于 72.4%(护士为 79.3%,医生为 68.5%,<0.001)的患者。医生的咨询时间<25 分钟的情况更为常见(80.4%vs.56.9%,<0.001)。根据提供者的说法,三分之二的患者在咨询中发言时间超过一半(门诊 75.2%vs.普通诊所 66.6%,=0.002;护士 73.2%vs.医生 64.4%,=0.001)。提供者表示,与患者相关的因素通常决定治疗目标。几乎所有患者(94.4%)报告说他们做出了共同决策;他们感到比以前更有参与感(与医生相比为 45.1%,与护士相比为 33.6%,<0.001),并对咨询给予 8.6 的评分(满分 10 分)。在医生主导的咨询后,52.5%的患者报告说咨询比以前更好(护士就诊为 33.7%,<0.001)。
促进以患者为中心的护理的咨询模式似乎适用性良好,可提高患者的参与度,包括共同决策,并得到了相当数量的患者的赞赏。