Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
RMIT University, Centre for Urban Research, Melbourne, Australia.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Jan 25;15(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0625-5.
Designing parks that optimise visitation and support visitors to be active is important for public health. Yet there is very little evidence about whether playground refurbishment achieves these objectives. This study examined the impact of the installation of a play-scape in a large metropolitan park in Melbourne, Australia.
Natural experiment study (intervention vs control). At both parks, park visitation and physical activity were assessed before (T1, 2013) and after the intervention at 12 (T2, 2014) and 24 months (T3, 2015). At each time point, measures included: observations of park visitors using the System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities on four weekdays and four weekend days, objective monitors to record usage of the walking paths and the number of cars entering the park; and intercept surveys with adult park visitors. Cross-sectional surveys were conducted with local residents at T1 and T3.
The observational data showed a 176% increase in park visitor counts from T1 to T2 (Incidence Rate Ratio (IRR) = 2.76, 95% CI = 1.04-7.33), at the intervention park relative to the control park. The intervention park had a 119% increase in counts of visitors observed engaging in MVPA from T1 to T2 (IRR = 2.19, 95% CI = 1.14-4.20), and a 128% increase from T1 to T3 (IRR = 2.28, 95% CI = 1.19-4.38), relative to the control park. The relative increases in visitation at the intervention park play-scape compared with the control park playground were highly statistically significant from both T1 to T2 (IRR = 18.12, 95% CI = 5.51-59.59) and T1 to T3 (IRR = 15.05, 95% CI = 4.61-49.16). Similarly, there was a significant interaction between time and park with regard to the number of visitors observed engaging in MVPA in the play-scape/playground areas. The intercept survey data showed an increased odds of children's regular visitation to the intervention park at T2 (OR = 2.67, 95% CI = 1.08, 6.64), compared with T1, relative to the control park. The remaining results from the intercept survey, objective monitors and resident surveys showed no significant differences in visitation between the two parks.
These findings confirm that a well-designed play-scape installation has the potential to increase park visitation and encourage visitors to be physically active.
Current controlled trial ISRCTN50745547 .
设计能优化游客到访并支持游客积极活动的公园,对于公共健康很重要。然而,关于游乐场改造是否能实现这些目标,几乎没有证据。本研究考察了在澳大利亚墨尔本一个大型都会公园中安装游乐景观的影响。
自然实验研究(干预组与对照组)。在两个公园中,在干预前(T1,2013 年)和干预后 12 个月(T2,2014 年)和 24 个月(T3,2015 年)时,评估了公园的游客访问量和身体活动情况。在每个时间点,测量包括:在四个工作日和四个周末日,使用社区游乐观察系统对公园游客进行观察;使用客观监测器记录步道的使用情况和进入公园的汽车数量;以及对成年公园游客进行拦截调查。在 T1 和 T3 时,对当地居民进行了横断面调查。
观察数据显示,干预公园的游客计数从 T1 到 T2 增加了 176%(发病率比(IRR)=2.76,95%置信区间(CI)=1.04-7.33),与对照组公园相比。干预公园的游客观察到的中高强度身体活动(MVPA)计数从 T1 到 T2 增加了 119%(IRR=2.19,95%CI=1.14-4.20),从 T1 到 T3 增加了 128%(IRR=2.28,95%CI=1.19-4.38),与对照组公园相比。与对照组公园游乐场相比,干预公园游乐景观的游客访问量增加幅度在 T1 到 T2(IRR=18.12,95%CI=5.51-59.59)和 T1 到 T3(IRR=15.05,95%CI=4.61-49.16)时均具有统计学意义。同样,在观察到的 MVPA 游客数量方面,时间和公园之间存在显著的交互作用。拦截调查数据显示,与对照组公园相比,T2 时儿童定期访问干预公园的可能性增加(OR=2.67,95%CI=1.08,6.64),与 T1 相比。拦截调查、客观监测器和居民调查的其余结果显示,两个公园的游客访问量没有显著差异。
这些发现证实,精心设计的游乐景观安装具有增加公园游客访问量和鼓励游客积极活动的潜力。
当前对照试验 ISRCTN50745547。