Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Immunology and Allergy Unit, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institute, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden.
J Autoimmun. 2018 Feb;87:50-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2017.12.003. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
Upon interaction with dendritic cells (DCs), naïve CD4 T cells differentiate into distinct subsets and orchestrate the development of a physiological immune response. When uncontrolled by cellular and molecular mechanisms, CD4 T cells can also lead to immune mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). Initially, these distinct CD4 T-cell subsets were defined according to the expression of a limited number of cytokines. Later it was revealed that CD4 T cells can acquire much more complex functional phenotypes than previously thought. Experimental data showed that the CD4 T-cell subset T17 can secrete IFN-γ and IL-4, which are signature molecules of other T-cell subsets. Furthermore, some T17 cells can also explore an anti-inflammatory fate and participate in the resolution of the immune response. A more flexible theory has therefore evolved with the scope to better represent the plastic biology of CD4 T cells. In this context, several aspects still remain unclear. The goal of this review is to discuss the role of extrinsic and intrinsic cellular and molecular mechanisms, which can drive the plasticity of T17 cells. In particular, we will outline the role of DCs and the function of transcriptional factors in shaping the fate of T17 cells towards either a pathogenic or a regulatory phenotype. Finally, we will discuss whether T17 cell plasticity could be a target for new therapies for IMIDs. We indeed envision that when the cellular and molecular mechanisms controlling T17 plasticity are known, new therapies, which aim to reset the immune system, will be developed. This will be achieved by either selectively depleting only the pathogenic T17 cells or, if possible, re converting these cells from pathogenic to regulatory. This will overcome the challenge posed by the immune suppressive side effects caused by the current therapies, which impair the function of CD4 cells or delete all of them, to the detriment of the patient.
当与树突状细胞(DC)相互作用时,幼稚 CD4 T 细胞分化为不同的亚群,并协调生理免疫反应的发展。当不受细胞和分子机制的控制时,CD4 T 细胞也可能导致免疫介导的炎症性疾病(IMIDs)。最初,这些不同的 CD4 T 细胞亚群是根据有限数量的细胞因子的表达来定义的。后来发现,CD4 T 细胞可以获得比以前想象的更复杂的功能表型。实验数据表明,CD4 T 细胞亚群 T17 可以分泌 IFN-γ 和 IL-4,这是其他 T 细胞亚群的特征分子。此外,一些 T17 细胞也可以探索抗炎命运并参与免疫反应的解决。因此,一个更灵活的理论已经出现,旨在更好地代表 CD4 T 细胞的可塑性生物学。在这种情况下,仍有几个方面尚不清楚。本综述的目的是讨论外在和内在细胞和分子机制如何驱动 T17 细胞的可塑性。特别是,我们将概述 DC 的作用和转录因子在塑造 T17 细胞的命运向致病性或调节性表型的作用。最后,我们将讨论 T17 细胞可塑性是否可能成为治疗 IMIDs 的新疗法的靶点。我们确实设想,当控制 T17 可塑性的细胞和分子机制被知晓时,将开发旨在重置免疫系统的新疗法。这可以通过选择性地仅耗尽致病性 T17 细胞来实现,或者,如果可能的话,将这些细胞从致病性转化为调节性。这将克服当前疗法因免疫抑制副作用而带来的挑战,这些副作用会损害 CD4 细胞的功能或删除所有 CD4 细胞,从而损害患者的健康。