Department of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Int Endod J. 2018 Aug;51(8):862-876. doi: 10.1111/iej.12899. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
The acidic nature of commercial local anaesthetics (LAs) can cause pain during infiltration and delay the onset of anaesthesia. It is suggested that adjusting the pH of anaesthetic agents could minimize these effects. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of buffered LAs in reducing infiltration pain and onset time during dental procedures. MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus and Scielo databases were searched up to April 2017. Randomized controlled trials comparing buffered and unbuffered LAs for intraoral injections were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. Data upon injection pain and onset time were pooled in a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses compared normal and inflamed tissues, and terminal infiltrations and inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) blocks. Meta-regressions were performed to explain heterogeneity. Fourteen articles were included in this review. Lidocaine with epinephrine was the most used anaesthetic combination. Nonlidocaine studies (n = 2) were not pooled in the meta-analysis. Buffered lidocaine did not result in less pain during intraoral injections: mean difference -6.4 (95% CI -12.81 to 0.01) units in a 0-100 scale. Alkalinized lidocaine did not reduce the onset time in normal tissues when terminal infiltration techniques were used, but resulted in a more rapid onset for IAN blocks (-1.26 min) and in inflamed tissues (-1.37 min); however, this change may not be clinically relevant, considering the time required to prepare the buffered agent. Studies performed using other anaesthetic salts did not show robust and clinically significant results in favour of alkalinization.
商业局部麻醉剂(LA)的酸性性质会在浸润过程中引起疼痛,并延迟麻醉的开始。有人建议,调整麻醉剂的 pH 值可以最小化这些影响。本系统评价旨在评估缓冲局部麻醉剂在减少牙科手术中浸润疼痛和起始时间的效果。检索了 MEDLINE、Embase、Scopus 和 Scielo 数据库,截至 2017 年 4 月。包括了比较口腔内注射时缓冲和未缓冲 LA 的随机对照试验。使用 Cochrane 协作工具评估偏倚风险。将注射疼痛和起始时间的数据汇总到随机效应模型中。亚组分析比较了正常和炎症组织、终末浸润和下牙槽神经(IAN)阻滞。进行了 meta 回归来解释异质性。本综述纳入了 14 篇文章。含肾上腺素的利多卡因是最常用的麻醉组合。非利多卡因研究(n=2)未纳入 meta 分析。缓冲利多卡因并未在口腔内注射时减少疼痛:0-100 量表上的平均差异为-6.4(95%CI-12.81 至 0.01)单位。在使用终末浸润技术时,碱性利多卡因不会减少正常组织的起始时间,但会使 IAN 阻滞(-1.26 分钟)和炎症组织(-1.37 分钟)更快开始;然而,考虑到准备缓冲剂所需的时间,这种变化可能在临床上没有意义。使用其他麻醉盐进行的研究没有显示出有利于碱化的强有力且具有临床意义的结果。