Suppr超能文献

肿瘤医院护士的心理灵活性:中文版工作相关接纳与行动问卷的初步验证

Psychological Flexibility of Nurses in a Cancer Hospital: Preliminary Validation of a Chinese Version of the Work-related Acceptance and Action Questionnaire.

作者信息

Xu Xianghua, Liu Xiangyu, Ou Meijun, Xie Chanjuan, Chen Yongyi

机构信息

Department of Nursing, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University/Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, China.

出版信息

Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2018 Jan-Mar;5(1):83-90. doi: 10.4103/apjon.apjon_62_17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To translate the English work-related acceptance and action questionnaire (WAAQ), make cross-cultural adaptations, and examine its psychometric properties when used by Chinese oncology nurses.

METHODS

After translation, the psychometric properties of the Chinese WAAQ were analyzed among 417 nurses, and content validity was determined by six experts.

RESULTS

Item-level content validity index (CVI) values were between 0.83 and 1.00; scale-level CVI/universal agreement (S-CVI/UA) and S-CVI/average were 0.86 and 0.98, respectively, which implicated a good content validity. The correlation of the Chinese WAAQ with AAQ-II ( = -0.247, < 0.001) suggested criterion validity, and those with General Health Questionnaire-12 (-0.250, <0.001) and general self-efficacy scale (0.491, <0.001) and Utrecht work engagement scale (UWES) (0.439, <0.001) suggested convergent validity. Exploratory factor analysis identified a seven-item, one-factor structure of WAAQ. The Chinese version of WAAQ had high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.920), with an item-total correlation coefficient of 0.702-0.828 ( < 0.05), split-half reliability of 0.933, and test-retest reliability of 0.772.

CONCLUSIONS

The Chinese WAAQ is a reliable and valid tool for assessing psychological flexibility in Chinese oncology nurses.

摘要

目的

翻译英文工作相关接纳与行动问卷(WAAQ),进行跨文化调适,并检验中国肿瘤护理人员使用该问卷时的心理测量学特性。

方法

翻译后,对417名护士分析中文WAAQ的心理测量学特性,并由6名专家确定内容效度。

结果

条目水平的内容效度指数(CVI)值在0.83至1.00之间;量表水平的CVI/全体一致(S-CVI/UA)和S-CVI/平均值分别为0.86和0.98,表明内容效度良好。中文WAAQ与AAQ-II的相关性(=-0.247,<0.001)表明效标效度,与一般健康问卷-12(-0.250,<0.001)、一般自我效能量表(0.491,<0.001)和乌得勒支工作投入量表(UWES)(0.439,<0.001)的相关性表明聚合效度。探索性因素分析确定了WAAQ的一个七条目单因素结构。中文WAAQ具有较高的内部一致性(Cronbach's α=0.920),条目-总分相关系数为0.702-0.828(<0.05),分半信度为0.933,重测信度为0.772。

结论

中文WAAQ是评估中国肿瘤护理人员心理灵活性的可靠且有效的工具。

相似文献

2
Psychometric validation of the modified Chinese version of the personalized psychological flexibility index in patients with cancer.
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2023 Apr 23;10(6):100240. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2023.100240. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the postpartum depression literacy scale.
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 9;13:966770. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.966770. eCollection 2022.
5
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Self-Efficacy Perception Scale for Administrator Nurses.
Int J Nurs Sci. 2023 Sep 28;10(4):503-510. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2023.09.015. eCollection 2023 Oct.
6
The Spanish version of the Work-related Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (WAAQ).
Psicothema. 2014;26(1):63-8. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2013.110.
7
[Reliability and validity of food allergy quality of life-parental burden scale in China].
Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2022 May 2;60(5):421-425. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112140-20211221-01060.
8
Validity and reliability of the toxic leadership behaviors of nurse managers scale among Chinese nurses.
Front Psychol. 2024 Mar 25;15:1363792. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1363792. eCollection 2024.
9
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the burnout syndrome assessment scale in nurses.
Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 23;15:1309090. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1309090. eCollection 2024.
10
Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Brief-Mindful Self-Care Scale: A Translation and Validation Study.
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 13;12:715507. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.715507. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

2
Factors Influencing Emergency Nurses' Burnout During an Outbreak of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus in Korea.
Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2016 Dec;10(4):295-299. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2016.10.002. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
4
6
Depression, Anxiety and Symptoms of Stress among Baccalaureate Nursing Students in Hong Kong: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Aug 3;13(8):779. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13080779.
7
Healthcare Staff Wellbeing, Burnout, and Patient Safety: A Systematic Review.
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 8;11(7):e0159015. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159015. eCollection 2016.
8
Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use (5th edition).
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2016 Jun;40(3):294-5. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12484.
9
Work related stress, burnout, job satisfaction and general health of nurses: A follow-up study.
Int J Nurs Pract. 2016 Dec;22(6):538-545. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12455. Epub 2016 May 30.
10
Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Levels of Burnout Among Oncology Nurses: A Systematic Review.
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2016 May 1;43(3):E104-20. doi: 10.1188/16.ONF.E104-E120.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验