Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Macau, Avenida da Universidade, Taipa, Macao, China.
Department of Social Science, Hang Seng Management College, Hong Kong, China.
J Gambl Stud. 2018 Dec;34(4):1261-1280. doi: 10.1007/s10899-018-9750-6.
Responsible gambling (RG) is a relatively new concept to the Macao gambling industry. Although recent studies reported a heightened public awareness of RG, the prevalence of disordered gambling is still high. This discrepancy may suggest an existing gap between RG awareness and gambling practices, pinpointing aspects that need to be improved by different RG stakeholders. The gap may be attributable to people's limited knowledge toward practices favoring RG. To explore means for enhancing the RG campaign, we studied Macao residents' interpretation and adoption of RG practices. In Study 1, a random community sample was collected to assess the extent to which common RG practices were adopted. Results suggested that there was a fair proportion of gamblers not adhering to them and gambling disorder tendency was related to the adoption of RG practices. It implied a successful promotion of RG practices may reduce gambling problems. In Study 2, focus group discussions were conducted to explore how RG was conceptualized. Twenty-five participants (including 11 casino employees) took part in four focus group interviews. All participants were aware of RG but their knowledge of RG practices was limited. Very few of them were able to identify major practices such as putting constraints on gambling amount and time and the application for self-exclusion. We argue that future RG promotion needs to be more specific and behavior-oriented and it should also address various procedural concerns on how RG practices can be implemented.
负责任赌博(RG)对澳门博彩业来说是一个相对较新的概念。尽管最近的研究报告称公众对 RG 的认识有所提高,但赌博障碍的患病率仍然很高。这种差异可能表明 RG 意识和赌博行为之间存在现有差距,需要由不同的 RG 利益相关者来改进。这种差距可能归因于人们对有利于 RG 的实践的了解有限。为了探索加强 RG 运动的方法,我们研究了澳门居民对 RG 实践的解释和采用。在研究 1 中,我们随机收集了社区样本,以评估常见 RG 实践的采用程度。结果表明,有相当一部分赌徒不遵守这些规定,而赌博障碍倾向与 RG 实践的采用有关。这意味着成功推广 RG 实践可能会减少赌博问题。在研究 2 中,我们进行了焦点小组讨论,以探讨 RG 是如何被概念化的。25 名参与者(包括 11 名赌场员工)参加了四个焦点小组访谈。所有参与者都意识到 RG,但他们对 RG 实践的了解有限。他们中很少有人能够识别出主要的实践,如限制赌博金额和时间以及申请自我排除。我们认为,未来的 RG 推广需要更加具体和以行为为导向,还应解决 RG 实践如何实施的各种程序性问题。