Liudahl Adam A, Davis Andrew B, Liudahl Danielle S, Maley Joan, Policeni Bruno, Hansen Marlan R
Department of Radiology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, U.S.A.
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, U.S.A.
Laryngoscope. 2018 Sep;128(9):2128-2132. doi: 10.1002/lary.27100. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of constructive interference steady state (CISS) sequencing compared to gadolinium-enhanced T1 (GdT1) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to screen for small vestibular schwannomas (VSs), and to assess the overall diagnostic confidence of neuroradiologists in their ability to accurately diagnose or rule out VSs using CISS imaging compared to a GdT1 MRI STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review.
Chart review from 2011 to 2015 was performed for VS/benign cerebellopontine angle tumors. Two blinded, board-certified neuroradiologists each independently reviewed the axial CISS sequence and answered a set of questions that determined their confidence in diagnosis of VS. Next, each neuroradiologist independently reviewed the corresponding GdT1 MRI sequence and completed the same questionnaire.
The majority of the lesions were in the lateral internal auditory canal, with eight intralabyrinthine tumors. The overall sensitivity of CISS for both readers was 93.5%. All tumor locations had high sensitivities except for the intralabyrinthine location (62.3%). Four of the eight total intralabyrinthine lesions were missed by at least one reader. Each reader was highly confident in diagnosing VSs with CISS, which approximated that of GdT1 MRI.
This study's results showed that CISS examinations for screening of small VS approximated that of GdT1. Neuroradiologists had high sensitivity, perfect specificity, and felt confident in ruling out a VS on CISS sequence while feeling extremely confident in diagnosing one on CISS. Intralabyrinthine lesions and lesions ≤3.0 mm are most at risk for not being detected on CISS examinations.
4 Laryngoscope, 128:2128-2132, 2018.
目的/假设:本研究的目的是评估与钆增强T1(GdT1)磁共振成像(MRI)相比,稳态构成干扰序列(CISS)对小听神经瘤(VS)进行筛查的诊断准确性,并评估神经放射科医生使用CISS成像与GdT1 MRI相比准确诊断或排除VS的总体诊断信心。研究设计:回顾性病历审查。
对2011年至2015年期间的VS/良性桥小脑角肿瘤进行病历审查。两名获得委员会认证的盲法神经放射科医生各自独立审查轴向CISS序列,并回答一组问题,以确定他们对VS诊断的信心。接下来,每位神经放射科医生独立审查相应的GdT1 MRI序列并完成相同的问卷。
大多数病变位于内耳道外侧,有8例迷路内肿瘤。两位读者对CISS的总体敏感性为93.5%。除迷路内位置(62.3%)外,所有肿瘤位置的敏感性都很高。8例迷路内病变中有4例至少被一位读者漏诊。每位读者对使用CISS诊断VS都非常有信心,这与GdT1 MRI相近。
本研究结果表明,CISS检查对小VS的筛查效果与GdT1相近。神经放射科医生具有高敏感性、完美的特异性,对在CISS序列上排除VS有信心,而对在CISS上诊断VS则非常有信心。迷路内病变和≤3.0毫米的病变在CISS检查中最有可能未被检测到。
4 喉镜,128:2128 - 2132,2018年。