O'Connor Sam A, Brooklyn Trevor N, Dunckley Paul D, Valori Roland M, Carr Ruth, Foy Chris, Somarathna Thusitha, Adamczyk Lukasz A, Shepherd Neil A, Anderson John T
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Ipswich Rd, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia.
Department of Gastroenterology, Cheltenham General Hospital, Sandford Road, Cheltenham, UK.
Endosc Int Open. 2018 Feb;6(2):E173-E178. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-121874. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
The majority of polyps removed at colonoscopy are diminutive (≤ 5 mm) to small (< 10 mm) and there are few guidelines for the best way for these polyps to be removed. We aimed to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of cold biopsy forceps polypectomy with pre-lift (CBPP) for polyps ≤ 7 mm. Our aims were to assess completeness of histological resection of this technique, to identify factors contributing to this and assess secondary considerations such as timing, retrieval and complication rates.
We conducted a prospective cohort study on consecutive patients receiving a colonoscopy at Cheltenham General Hospital, as part of the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program (BCSP) in England. The study included only polyps that were judged as ≤ 7 mm by the colonoscopist. A small sub-mucosal pre-lift injection was administered prior to removal of the polyp using cold biopsy forceps. One or more biopsies were taken until the polyp was confidently assessed visually as being completely removed by the colonoscopist. The entire polypectomy site was then removed en bloc by endomucosal resection (EMR) with a margin of at least 1 to 2 mm around defect. This was sent for histopathological analysis to assess completeness of resection. Polypectomy timing, tissue retrieval, number of bites required for visual resection and complications were recorded at the time of the procedure.
Sixty-four patients were recruited and consented. Of them, 42 patients had a total of 60 polyps resected. Three patients had inflammatory polyps and were excluded from the study, leaving 57/60 polyps for final analysis. Seventeen were hyperplastic and 40 adenomatous polyps. Retrieval was complete for all 57 polyps and there were no complications both during or post- polypectomy. The complete resection rate (CRR) was 86 %. The technique was more effective in smaller polyps with 91.7 % of diminutive polyps (≤ 5 mm) completely excised.
CBPP is a safe and highly effective technique for polyps < 5 mm with a high complete resection and retrieval rate. The time taken for the procedure is significantly greater than cold forceps alone, or cold snare as seen in other studies.
结肠镜检查时切除的大多数息肉为微小息肉(≤5毫米)至小息肉(<10毫米),对于这些息肉的最佳切除方法,几乎没有相关指南。我们旨在评估预抬举冷活检钳息肉切除术(CBPP)用于切除≤7毫米息肉的可行性和有效性。我们的目的是评估该技术组织学切除的完整性,确定影响其完整性的因素,并评估诸如时机、标本获取及并发症发生率等次要因素。
作为英国国家肠癌筛查计划(BCSP)的一部分,我们对在切尔滕纳姆综合医院连续接受结肠镜检查的患者进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。该研究仅纳入结肠镜检查医生判定为≤7毫米的息肉。在使用冷活检钳切除息肉之前,先进行小剂量黏膜下预抬举注射。取一次或多次活检样本,直到结肠镜检查医生确信通过肉眼评估息肉已完全切除。然后通过内镜黏膜切除术(EMR)将整个息肉切除部位整块切除,切除边缘距缺损至少1至2毫米。将切除标本送去进行组织病理学分析,以评估切除的完整性。在手术过程中记录息肉切除的时机、组织获取情况、肉眼切除所需的钳夹次数以及并发症情况。
招募了64名患者并获得其同意。其中,42名患者共切除了60个息肉。3名患者患有炎性息肉,被排除在研究之外,最终分析留下57/60个息肉。17个为增生性息肉,40个为腺瘤性息肉。所有57个息肉的标本获取均完整,息肉切除过程中及术后均无并发症。完整切除率(CRR)为86%。该技术在较小息肉中更有效,91.7%的微小息肉(≤5毫米)被完全切除。
CBPP是一种用于<5毫米息肉的安全且高效的技术,具有较高的完整切除率和标本获取率。与其他研究中单独使用冷活检钳或冷圈套器相比,该手术所需时间明显更长。