• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparative efficacy of tamsulosin versus tadalafil as medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteric stones.坦索罗辛与他达拉非作为远端输尿管结石药物排石疗法的疗效比较。
Urol Ann. 2018 Jan-Mar;10(1):82-86. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_36_17.
2
Comparative efficacy of tadalafil versus tamsulosin as the medical expulsive therapy in lower ureteric stone: a prospective randomized trial.他达拉非与坦索罗辛作为输尿管下段结石药物排石疗法的疗效比较:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Cent European J Urol. 2016;69(2):178-82. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2016.766. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
3
Comparative efficacy of tamsulosin versus tamsulosin with tadalafil in combination with prednisolone for the medical expulsive therapy of lower ureteric stones: a randomized trial.坦索罗辛与坦索罗辛联合他达拉非并加用泼尼松龙用于下段输尿管结石药物排石治疗的疗效比较:一项随机试验
Korean J Urol. 2014 Mar;55(3):196-200. doi: 10.4111/kju.2014.55.3.196. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
4
Tamsulosin versus tamsulosin plus tadalafil as medical expulsive therapy for lower ureteric stones: a randomized controlled trial.坦索罗辛与坦索罗辛联合他达拉非作为输尿管下段结石药物排石治疗的随机对照试验
Int J Urol. 2014 Oct;21(10):1012-5. doi: 10.1111/iju.12496. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
5
Tamsulosin versus tadalafil as a medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral stones: A prospective randomized study.坦索罗辛与他达拉非作为治疗远端输尿管结石的医学排石疗法:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Investig Clin Urol. 2016 Sep;57(5):351-6. doi: 10.4111/icu.2016.57.5.351. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
6
Efficacy of tamsulosin versus tadalafil as medical expulsive therapy on stone expulsion in patients with distal ureteral stones: A randomized double-blind clinical trial.坦索罗辛与他达拉非作为排石疗法治疗输尿管下段结石患者排石效果的比较:一项随机、双盲的临床试验。
Int Braz J Urol. 2021 Sep-Oct;47(5):982-988. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.1007.
7
Role of tamsulosin, tadalafil, and silodosin as the medical expulsive therapy in lower ureteric stone: a randomized trial (a pilot study).坦索罗辛、他达拉非和西洛多辛作为输尿管下段结石药物排石疗法的作用:一项随机试验(一项初步研究)。
Urology. 2015 Jan;85(1):59-63. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.09.022.
8
Tadalafil versus alpha blockers (alfuzosin, doxazosin, tamsulosin and silodosin) as medical expulsive therapy for < 10 mm distal and proximal ureteral stones.他达拉非与α受体阻滞剂(阿夫唑嗪、多沙唑嗪、坦索罗辛和西洛多辛)作为<10毫米远端和近端输尿管结石的药物排石疗法。
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2018 Jun 30;90(2):117-122. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2018.2.117.
9
Randomized controlled trial to compare the safety and efficacy of naftopidil and tamsulosin as medical expulsive therapy in combination with prednisolone for distal ureteral stones.比较萘哌地尔和坦索罗辛作为药物排石疗法联合泼尼松龙治疗远端输尿管结石的安全性和有效性的随机对照试验。
Korean J Urol. 2013 May;54(5):311-5. doi: 10.4111/kju.2013.54.5.311. Epub 2013 May 14.
10
Comparing tamsulosin, silodosin versus silodosin plus tadalafil as medical expulsive therapy for lower ureteric stones: A randomised trial.坦索罗辛、西洛多辛与西洛多辛联合他达拉非作为下输尿管结石药物排石疗法的比较:一项随机试验。
Arab J Urol. 2017 Dec 24;16(2):245-249. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2017.11.012. eCollection 2018 Jun.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing efficacy and safety of monotherapy and combination therapy with tadalafil, tamsulosin, and silodosin for distal ureteral stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis.他达拉非、坦索罗辛和西洛多辛单药治疗与联合治疗远端输尿管结石的疗效和安全性比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Asian J Urol. 2025 Apr;12(2):189-203. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2024.05.003. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
2
Efficacy of Silodosin and Tadalafil monotherapy versus combination of both drugs as MET for distal ureteric stones: A prospective, double blinded, randomized clinical trial.西洛多辛与他达拉非单药治疗及两药联合作为远端输尿管结石的体外冲击波碎石术的疗效:一项前瞻性、双盲、随机临床试验。
Arab J Urol. 2024 Sep 16;23(2):124-130. doi: 10.1080/20905998.2024.2403274. eCollection 2025.
3
Pooled-analysis of tadalafil and tamsulosin for ureteral calculi.他达拉非与坦索罗辛治疗输尿管结石的荟萃分析。
Front Pharmacol. 2024 May 30;15:1351312. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1351312. eCollection 2024.
4
Tamsulosin vs. Tadalafil as medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis.坦索罗辛与他达拉非用于治疗远端输尿管结石的医学排石治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Braz J Urol. 2023 Nov-Dec;49(6):668-676. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2023.0345.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative efficacy of tamsulosin versus tamsulosin with tadalafil in combination with prednisolone for the medical expulsive therapy of lower ureteric stones: a randomized trial.坦索罗辛与坦索罗辛联合他达拉非并加用泼尼松龙用于下段输尿管结石药物排石治疗的疗效比较:一项随机试验
Korean J Urol. 2014 Mar;55(3):196-200. doi: 10.4111/kju.2014.55.3.196. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
2
Monotherapy with tadalafil or tamsulosin similarly improved lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia in an international, randomised, parallel, placebo-controlled clinical trial.在一项国际性、随机、平行、安慰剂对照的临床试验中,单用他达拉非或坦索罗辛同样改善了良性前列腺增生症的下尿路症状。
Eur Urol. 2012 May;61(5):917-25. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.01.013. Epub 2012 Jan 20.
3
Naftopidil vs silodosin in medical expulsive therapy for ureteral stones: a randomized controlled study in Japanese male patients.萘哌地尔与西洛多辛在输尿管结石的医学排石治疗中的比较:一项日本男性患者的随机对照研究。
Int J Urol. 2011 Nov;18(11):792-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2011.02850.x. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
4
Comparing efficacy of α1D-receptor antagonist naftopidil and α1A/D-receptor antagonist tamsulosin in management of distal ureteral stones.比较 α1D-受体拮抗剂萘哌地尔和 α1A/D-受体拮抗剂坦索罗辛在处理输尿管远端结石中的疗效。
World J Urol. 2011 Dec;29(6):767-71. doi: 10.1007/s00345-011-0739-3. Epub 2011 Aug 4.
5
Medical expulsive therapy using alfuzosin for patient presenting with ureteral stone less than 10mm: a prospective randomized controlled trial.应用阿夫唑嗪行医学排石疗法治疗小于 10mm 的输尿管结石患者:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Int J Urol. 2011 Jul;18(7):510-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2011.02780.x. Epub 2011 May 18.
6
Efficacy of low dose tamsulosin in medical expulsive therapy for ureteral stones in Japanese male patients: a randomized controlled study.低剂量坦索罗辛在日本男性患者药物排石治疗输尿管结石中的疗效:一项随机对照研究。
Int J Urol. 2010 May;17(5):462-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2010.02499.x. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
7
Preliminary study of efficacy of doxazosin as a medical expulsive therapy of distal ureteric stones in a randomized clinical trial.多沙唑嗪作为一种随机临床试验中远端输尿管结石的药物排石疗法的疗效初步研究。
Urology. 2010 Jun;75(6):1285-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.10.069. Epub 2010 Feb 26.
8
Efficacy of tamsulosin in the management of lower ureteral stones: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study of 100 patients.坦索罗辛治疗输尿管下段结石的疗效:100 例患者随机双盲安慰剂对照研究。
Urology. 2010 Jan;75(1):4-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.09.073.
9
Medical therapy to facilitate the passage of stones: what is the evidence?促进结石排出的医学疗法:证据是什么?
Eur Urol. 2009 Sep;56(3):455-71. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.06.012. Epub 2009 Jun 21.
10
Prospective randomized trial comparing efficacy of alfuzosin and tamsulosin in management of lower ureteral stones.比较阿夫唑嗪和坦索罗辛治疗输尿管下段结石疗效的前瞻性随机试验。
Urology. 2009 Apr;73(4):706-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.11.013. Epub 2009 Feb 4.

坦索罗辛与他达拉非作为远端输尿管结石药物排石疗法的疗效比较。

Comparative efficacy of tamsulosin versus tadalafil as medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteric stones.

作者信息

Goyal Suresh Kumar, Singh Vikash, Pandey Himanshu, Chhabra Mahaveer Kumar, Aggarwal Satinder Pal, Bhat Amilal

机构信息

Department of Urology, Dr. S. N. Medical College, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.

Department of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.

出版信息

Urol Ann. 2018 Jan-Mar;10(1):82-86. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_36_17.

DOI:10.4103/UA.UA_36_17
PMID:29416281
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5791464/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare the relative efficacy of tamsulosin and tadalafil as medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteric stones.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a prospective study performed between December 2014 and February 2016. A total of 123 adult patients (>18 years of age) presenting with distal ureteric stones sized 6-10 mm were randomized to treatment with tamsulosin 0.4 mg once daily (Group A) or tadalafil10 mg once daily (Group B). Therapy was given for a maximum of 4 weeks. The stone expulsion rate was the primary endpoint. Time to stone expulsion, number of colic episodes, analgesic use, number of hospital visits for pain, endoscopic treatment, and adverse effects of the drugs were noted. Statistical analyses were done using Fisher's exact test and Chi-square test.

RESULTS

A total of 61 patients were included in tamsulosin group and 62 patients in tadalafil group. A statistically insignificant difference was found for stone clearance rate between both groups as a whole (Group A-73.77%, Group B-69.35%, = 0.690) as well as when we considered both subgroups (A1-78.05%, B1-75.0%, = 0.802; A2-65.0%, B2-55.6%, = 0.741). All the primary and secondary outcome measures were more in favour of stones ≤8 mm size than stones >8 mm size. No statistical difference was found for adverse drug effects except for retrograde ejaculation, which was significantly high in tamsulosin group ( < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study showed that although tamsulosin is more effective for stone clearance than tadalafil, but this difference was not significant ( = 0.690).

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较坦索罗辛和他达拉非作为远端输尿管结石药物排石疗法的相对疗效。

患者与方法

这是一项于2014年12月至2016年2月进行的前瞻性研究。共有123例成年患者(年龄>18岁),患有6 - 10毫米大小的远端输尿管结石,被随机分为两组,A组每天服用一次0.4毫克坦索罗辛,B组每天服用一次10毫克他达拉非。治疗最长持续4周。结石排出率是主要终点指标。记录结石排出时间、绞痛发作次数、止痛药物使用情况、因疼痛就医次数、内镜治疗情况以及药物不良反应。采用Fisher精确检验和卡方检验进行统计分析。

结果

坦索罗辛组纳入61例患者,他达拉非组纳入62例患者。总体而言,两组之间的结石清除率无统计学显著差异(A组 - 73.77%,B组 - 69.35%,P = 0.690),在考虑两个亚组时也是如此(A1组 - 78.05%,B1组 - 75.0%,P = 0.802;A2组 - 65.0%,B2组 - 55.6%,P = 0.741)。所有主要和次要结局指标对≤8毫米大小的结石更有利,而不是>8毫米大小的结石。除逆行射精外,药物不良反应无统计学差异,逆行射精在坦索罗辛组显著更高(P<0.001)。

结论

本研究表明,虽然坦索罗辛在结石清除方面比他达拉非更有效,但这种差异不显著(P = 0.690)。