Department of Hematology and Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Department of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Oncologist. 2018 Jun;23(6):704-711. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0487. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
Management of pancreatic cancer (PC) in elderly patients is unknown; clinical trials exclude patients with comorbidities and those of extreme age. This study evaluated treatment patterns and survival outcomes in elderly PC patients using linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) and Medicare data.
Histology codes 8140, 8500, 8010, 8560, 8490, 8000, 8260, 8255, 8261, 8263, 8020, 8050, 8141, 8144, 8210, 8211, or 8262 in Medicare Parts A and B were identified. Data regarding demographic, characteristics, treatments, and vital status between 1998 and 2009 were collected from the SEER. Determinants of treatment receipt and overall survival were examined using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models, respectively.
A total of 5,975 patients met inclusion. The majority of patients were non-Hispanic whites (85%) and female (55%). Most cases presented with locoregional stage disease (74%); 41% received only chemotherapy, 30% chemotherapy and surgery, 10% surgery alone, 3% radiation, and 16% no cancer-directed therapy. Patients with more advanced cancer, older age, and those residing in areas of poverty were more likely to receive no treatment. Among patients 66-74 years of age with locoregional disease, surgery alone (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.39-0.74) and surgery in combination with chemotherapy (HR = 0.69; 95% CI: 0.53-0.91) showed survival benefit as compared with the no treatment group. Among patients ≥75 years of age with locoregional disease, surgery alone (HR = 2.04; 95% CI: 0.87-4.8) or in combination with chemotherapy (HR = 1.59; 95% CI: 0.87-2.91) was not associated with better survival.
Treatment modality and survival differs by age and stage. Low socioeconomic status appears to be a major barrier to the receipt of PC therapy among Medicare patients.
Elderly patients with cancer are under-represented on clinical trials and usually have comorbid illnesses. The management of elderly patients with pancreatic cancer is unknown, with many retrospective experiences but low sample sizes. Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked data to analyze treatment patterns and survival of elderly patients with pancreatic cancer on a larger population scale, this study highlights treatment patterns and their effect on survival and proposes possible obstacles to access of care in elderly patients with pancreatic cancer other than Medicare coverage.
老年胰腺癌(PC)患者的管理情况尚不清楚;临床试验排除了患有合并症和年龄过大的患者。本研究使用链接的监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)和医疗保险数据评估了老年 PC 患者的治疗模式和生存结果。
在医疗保险 A 部分和 B 部分中鉴定了组织学代码 8140、8500、8010、8560、8490、8000、8260、8255、8261、8263、8020、8050、8141、8144、8210、8211 或 8262。从 SEER 收集了 1998 年至 2009 年间与人口统计学、特征、治疗和生存状态相关的数据。使用逻辑回归和 Cox 比例风险模型分别检查了治疗接受和总生存的决定因素。
共有 5975 名患者符合纳入标准。大多数患者为非西班牙裔白人(85%)和女性(55%)。大多数病例表现为局部区域疾病(74%);41%仅接受化疗,30%接受化疗和手术,10%仅接受手术,3%接受放疗,16%未接受癌症定向治疗。癌症程度更严重、年龄更大以及居住在贫困地区的患者更有可能不接受治疗。在年龄为 66-74 岁、局部区域疾病的患者中,单独手术(风险比 [HR] = 0.54;95%置信区间 [CI]:0.39-0.74)和手术联合化疗(HR = 0.69;95% CI:0.53-0.91)与未治疗组相比具有生存优势。在年龄≥75 岁、局部区域疾病的患者中,单独手术(HR = 2.04;95% CI:0.87-4.8)或联合化疗(HR = 1.59;95% CI:0.87-2.91)与更好的生存无关。
治疗方式和生存因年龄和阶段而异。低社会经济地位似乎是医疗保险患者接受 PC 治疗的主要障碍。
癌症老年患者在临床试验中的代表性不足,通常患有合并症。老年胰腺癌患者的治疗方法尚不清楚,虽然有许多回顾性经验,但样本量较小。本研究使用监测、流行病学和最终结果-医疗保险链接数据,在更大的人群规模上分析了老年胰腺癌患者的治疗模式和生存情况,强调了治疗模式及其对生存的影响,并提出了除医疗保险覆盖范围之外,老年胰腺癌患者获得治疗的可能障碍。