Azadinia Fatemeh, Ebrahimi-Takamjani Ismail, Kamyab Mojtaba, Parnianpour Mohamad, Asgari Morteza
Department of Orthotics and Prosthetics, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Physical therapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2017 May 1;31:26. doi: 10.18869/mjiri.31.26. eCollection 2017.
Poor balance performance and impaired postural control have been frequently reported in patients with low back pain. However, postural control is rarely monitored during the course of treatment even though poor postural control may contribute to chronicity and recurrence of symptoms. Therefore, the present study aimed at investigating the effect of a nonextensible lumbosacral orthosis (LSO) versus routine physical therapy on postural stability of patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain. This was a randomized controlled trial conducted between November 2015 and May 2016 at the outpatient physical therapy clinic of the School of Rehabilitation Sciences. Patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain aged 20 to 55 years were randomly allocated to the intervention and control groups. Both groups received 8 sessions of physical therapy twice weekly for 4 weeks. The intervention group received nonextensible LSO in addition to routine physical therapy. Pain intensity, functional disability, fear of movement/ (re)injury, and postural stability in 3 levels of postural difficulty were measured before and after 4 weeks of intervention. A 2×2×3 mixed model of analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine the main and interactive effects of the 3 factors including group, time, and postural difficulty conditions for each variable of postural stability. The LSO and control groups displayed significant improvement in postural stability at the most difficult postural task conditions (P-value for 95% area ellipse was 0.003; and for phase plane, the mean total velocity and standard deviation of velocity was <0.001). Both groups exhibited a decrease in pain intensity, Oswestry Disability Index, and Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia after 4 weeks of intervention. A significant difference between groups was found only for functional disability, with greater improvement in the orthosis group (t = 3.60, P<0.001). Both routine physical therapy and LSO significantly improved clinical and postural stability outcomes immediately after 4 weeks of intervention. The orthosis group did not display superior outcomes, except for functional disability.
下背痛患者经常出现平衡能力差和姿势控制受损的情况。然而,尽管姿势控制不佳可能会导致症状的慢性化和复发,但在治疗过程中很少对其进行监测。因此,本研究旨在调查不可伸展性腰骶矫形器(LSO)与常规物理治疗对非特异性慢性下背痛患者姿势稳定性的影响。这是一项于2015年11月至2016年5月在康复科学学院门诊物理治疗诊所进行的随机对照试验。年龄在20至55岁之间的非特异性慢性下背痛患者被随机分配到干预组和对照组。两组均接受每周两次、为期4周、共8节的物理治疗。干预组除接受常规物理治疗外,还佩戴不可伸展性LSO。在干预4周前后,测量了疼痛强度、功能障碍、对运动/(再)损伤的恐惧以及在三种姿势难度水平下的姿势稳定性。采用2×2×3混合方差分析模型(ANOVA)来确定包括组、时间和姿势难度条件这三个因素对姿势稳定性各变量的主要和交互作用。在最困难的姿势任务条件下,LSO组和对照组的姿势稳定性均有显著改善(95%面积椭圆的P值为0.003;对于相平面,平均总速度和速度标准差<0.001)。干预4周后,两组的疼痛强度、Oswestry功能障碍指数和坦帕运动恐惧量表均有所下降。仅在功能障碍方面发现两组之间存在显著差异,矫形器组的改善更为明显(t = 3.60,P<0.001)。干预4周后,常规物理治疗和LSO均能显著改善临床和姿势稳定性结果。除功能障碍外,矫形器组并未表现出更好的效果。