Suppr超能文献

综合学术与健康教育能否预防药物使用?系统评价与荟萃分析。

Does integrated academic and health education prevent substance use? Systematic review and meta-analyses.

作者信息

Melendez-Torres G J, Tancred T, Fletcher A, Thomas J, Campbell R, Bonell C

机构信息

DECIPHer, School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

Department of Social and Environmental Health Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

出版信息

Child Care Health Dev. 2018 Jul;44(4):516-530. doi: 10.1111/cch.12558. Epub 2018 Feb 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prevention of substance (alcohol, tobacco, illegal/legal drug) use in adolescents is a public health priority. As the scope for school-based health education is constrained in school timetables, interventions integrating academic and health education have gained traction in the UK and elsewhere, though evidence for their effectiveness remains unclear. We sought to synthesize the effectiveness of interventions integrating academic and health education for the prevention of substance use.

METHODS

We searched 19 databases between November and December 2015, among other methods. We included randomized trials of interventions integrating academic and health education targeting school students aged 4-18 and reporting substance use outcomes. We excluded interventions for specific health-related subpopulations (e.g., children with behavioural difficulties). Data were extracted independently in duplicate. Outcomes were synthesized by school key stage (KS) using multilevel meta-analyses, for substance use, overall and by type.

RESULTS

We identified 7 trials reporting substance use. Interventions reduced substance use generally in years 7-9 (KS3) based on 5 evaluations (d = -0.09, 95% CI [-0.17, -0.01], I  = 35%), as well as in years 10-11 (KS4) based on 3 evaluations (-0.06, [-0.09, -0.02]; I  = 0%). Interventions were broadly effective for reducing specific alcohol, tobacco, and drug use in both KS groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence quality was highly variable. Findings for years 3-6 and 12-13 could not be meta-analysed, and we could not assess publication bias. Interventions appear to have a small but significant effect reducing substance use. Specific methods of integrating academic and health education remain poorly understood.

摘要

背景

预防青少年使用物质(酒精、烟草、非法/合法药物)是公共卫生的重点。由于学校课程表限制了校内健康教育的范围,将学术教育与健康教育相结合的干预措施在英国及其他地区受到了关注,但其有效性的证据仍不明确。我们试图综合分析将学术教育与健康教育相结合的干预措施在预防物质使用方面的有效性。

方法

2015年11月至12月期间,我们检索了19个数据库等。我们纳入了针对4至18岁在校学生、将学术教育与健康教育相结合并报告物质使用结果的干预措施的随机试验。我们排除了针对特定健康相关亚人群(如行为困难儿童)的干预措施。数据由两人独立重复提取。使用多水平荟萃分析按学校关键阶段(KS)对物质使用的总体情况及类型进行结果综合分析。

结果

我们确定了7项报告物质使用情况的试验。基于5项评估,干预措施总体上减少了7至9年级(KS3)的物质使用(d = -0.09,95%置信区间[-0.17, -0.01],I² = 35%),基于3项评估,也减少了10至11年级(KS4)的物质使用(-0.06,[-0.09, -0.02];I² = 0%)。干预措施在两个KS组中对减少特定的酒精、烟草和药物使用普遍有效。

结论

证据质量差异很大。无法对3至6年级和12至13年级的结果进行荟萃分析,我们也无法评估发表偏倚。干预措施似乎在减少物质使用方面有微小但显著的效果。学术教育与健康教育相结合的具体方法仍了解不足。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验