Suppr超能文献

心力衰竭:CHA2DS2-VASc 中的薄弱环节。

Heart failure: a weak link in CHA DS -VASc.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Sciences, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Cardiology, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

ESC Heart Fail. 2018 Jun;5(3):231-239. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12262. Epub 2018 Feb 15.

Abstract

AIMS

In atrial fibrillation, stroke risk is assessed by the CHA DS -VASc score. Heart failure is included in CHA DS -VASc, but the rationale is uncertain. Our objective was to test if heart failure is a risk factor for stroke, independent of other risk factors in CHA DS -VASc.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied 300 839 patients with atrial fibrillation in the Swedish Patient Register 2005-11. Three definitions of heart failure were used in order to assess the robustness of the results. In the main analysis, heart failure was defined by a hospital discharge diagnosis of heart failure as first or second diagnosis and a filled prescription of a diuretic within 3 months before index + 30 days. The second definition counted first or second discharge diagnoses <1 year before index + 30 days and the third definition any heart failure diagnosis in open or hospital care before index + 30 days. Associations with outcomes were assessed with multivariable Cox analyses. Patients with heart failure were older (80.5 vs. 74.0 years, P < 0.001) and had higher CHA DS -VASc score (4.4 vs. 2.7, P < 0.001). The 1 year incidence of ischaemic stroke without warfarin was 4.4% with heart failure and 3.1% without. Adjustment for the cofactors in CHA DS -VASc eradicated the difference in stroke risk between patients with and without heart failure (hazard ratio 1.01 with 95% confidence interval 0.96-1.05). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for CHA DS -VASc was not improved by points for heart failure.

CONCLUSIONS

A clinical diagnosis of heart failure was not an independent risk factor for stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation, which may have implications for anticoagulation management.

摘要

目的

在心房颤动中,中风风险通过 CHA2DS2-VASc 评分来评估。心力衰竭包含在 CHA2DS2-VASc 评分中,但其原理尚不清楚。我们的目的是检验心力衰竭是否是 CHA2DS2-VASc 中其他危险因素之外的中风危险因素。

方法和结果

我们研究了 2005 年至 2011 年在瑞典患者登记处的 300839 例心房颤动患者。使用了三种心力衰竭定义来评估结果的稳健性。在主要分析中,心力衰竭通过心力衰竭的医院出院诊断来定义,即首次或第二次诊断,并在指数+30 天内开具利尿剂处方。第二种定义计算了指数前<1 年的首次或第二次出院诊断+30 天,第三种定义则计算了指数前+30 天内的任何心力衰竭诊断,无论在开放性护理还是医院护理中。使用多变量 Cox 分析评估与结局的关联。心力衰竭患者年龄较大(80.5 岁 vs. 74.0 岁,P<0.001),CHA2DS2-VASc 评分较高(4.4 分 vs. 2.7 分,P<0.001)。没有华法林的缺血性中风的 1 年发生率为心力衰竭患者 4.4%,无心力衰竭患者为 3.1%。调整 CHA2DS2-VASc 中的混杂因素消除了心力衰竭患者与无心力衰竭患者之间的中风风险差异(风险比 1.01,95%置信区间 0.96-1.05)。CHA2DS2-VASc 的受试者工作特征曲线下面积并未因心力衰竭积分而得到改善。

结论

在心房颤动患者中,临床诊断的心力衰竭不是中风的独立危险因素,这可能对抗凝治疗管理有影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33d6/5933948/ec7137c8d74b/EHF2-5-231-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验