Kron Tomas, Chesson Brent, Hardcastle Nicholas, Crain Melissa, Clements Natalie, Burns Mark, Ball David
1 Department of Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre , Melbourne, VIC , Australia.
2 Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne , Parkville, VIC , Australia.
Br J Radiol. 2018 May;91(1085):20170737. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170737. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
A randomised clinical trial comparing stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) with conventional radiotherapy for early stage lung cancer has been conducted in Australia and New Zealand under the auspices of the TransTasman Radiation Oncology Group (NCT01014130). We report on the technical credentialing program as prerequisite for centres joining the trial.
Participating centres were asked to develop treatment plans for two test cases to assess their ability to create plans according to protocol. Dose delivery in the presence of inhomogeneity and motion was assessed during a site visit using a phantom with moving inserts.
Site visits for the trial were conducted in 16 Australian and 3 New Zealand radiotherapy facilities. The tests with low density inhomogeneities confirmed shortcomings of the AAA algorithm for dose calculation. Dose was assessed for a typical treatment delivery including at least one non-coplanar beam in a stationary and moving phantom. This end-to-end test confirmed that all participating centres were able to deliver stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy with the required accuracy while the planning study demonstrated that they were able to produce acceptable plans for both test cases.
The credentialing process documented that participating centres were able to deliver dose as required in the trial protocol. It also gave an opportunity to provide education about the trial and discuss technical issues such as four-dimensional CT, small field dosimetry and patient immobilisation with staff in participating centres. Advances in knowledge: Credentialing is an important quality assurance tool for radiotherapy trials using advanced technology. In addition to confirming technical competence, it provides an opportunity for education and discussion about the trial.
在跨塔斯曼放射肿瘤学组(NCT01014130)的支持下,澳大利亚和新西兰开展了一项随机临床试验,比较立体定向消融体部放疗(SABR)与早期肺癌常规放疗的效果。我们报告技术认证程序,这是各中心参与该试验的先决条件。
要求参与中心为两个测试病例制定治疗计划,以评估其按照方案制定计划的能力。在现场考察期间,使用带有移动插入物的模体评估存在不均匀性和运动情况下的剂量输送。
对澳大利亚的16个和新西兰的3个放射治疗机构进行了该试验的现场考察。低密度不均匀性测试证实了AAA剂量计算算法存在的缺陷。对典型治疗输送的剂量进行了评估,包括在静止和移动模体中至少有一个非共面射束的情况。这种端到端测试证实,所有参与中心都能够以所需的精度进行立体定向消融体部放疗,而规划研究表明,它们能够为两个测试病例制定出可接受的计划。
认证过程证明参与中心能够按照试验方案要求输送剂量。它还提供了一个机会,就该试验开展培训,并与参与中心的工作人员讨论技术问题,如四维CT、小射野剂量测定和患者固定。知识进展:认证是使用先进技术的放射治疗试验的重要质量保证工具。除了确认技术能力外,它还为试验培训和讨论提供了机会。