a Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health , University of Michigan.
b Department of Public Health Sciences , University of California Davis.
Epigenetics. 2018;13(1):108-116. doi: 10.1080/15592294.2017.1417710. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
Cord blood DNA methylation is associated with numerous health outcomes and environmental exposures. Whole cord blood DNA reflects all nucleated blood cell types, while centrifuging whole blood separates red blood cells, generating a white blood cell buffy coat. Both sample types are used in DNA methylation studies. Cell types have unique methylation patterns and processing can impact cell distributions, which may influence comparability. We evaluated differences in cell composition and DNA methylation between cord blood buffy coat and whole cord blood samples. Cord blood DNA methylation was measured with the Infinium EPIC BeadChip (Illumina) in eight individuals, each contributing buffy coat and whole blood samples. We analyzed principal components (PC) of methylation, performed hierarchical clustering, and computed correlations of mean-centered methylation between pairs. We conducted moderated t-tests on single sites and estimated cell composition. DNA methylation PCs were associated with individual (P = 1.4 × 10; P = 2.9 × 10; P = 3.8 × 10; P = 4.2 × 10; P = 9.9 × 10, P = 1.3 × 10) and not with sample type (P>0.7). Samples hierarchically clustered by individual. Pearson correlations of mean-centered methylation between paired samples ranged from r = 0.66 to r = 0.87. No individual site significantly differed between buffy coat and whole cord blood when adjusting for multiple comparisons (five sites had unadjusted P<10). Estimated cell type proportions did not differ by sample type (P = 0.46), and estimated proportions were highly correlated between paired samples (r = 0.99). Differences in methylation and cell composition between buffy coat and whole cord blood are much lower than inter-individual variation, demonstrating that both sample preparation types can be analytically combined and compared.
脐带血 DNA 甲基化与许多健康结果和环境暴露有关。整个脐带血 DNA 反映了所有有核血细胞类型,而离心全血则分离红细胞,产生白细胞层。这两种样本类型都用于 DNA 甲基化研究。细胞类型具有独特的甲基化模式,处理过程会影响细胞分布,这可能会影响可比性。我们评估了脐带血白细胞层和整个脐带血样本之间细胞组成和 DNA 甲基化的差异。在 8 个人中,每个个体都提供了白细胞层和全血样本,使用 Infinium EPIC BeadChip(Illumina)测量脐带血 DNA 甲基化。我们分析了甲基化的主成分(PC),进行了层次聚类,并计算了配对之间均值中心化甲基化的相关性。我们对单个位点进行了适度 t 检验,并估计了细胞组成。DNA 甲基化 PC 与个体相关(P = 1.4×10;P = 2.9×10;P = 3.8×10;P = 4.2×10;P = 9.9×10,P = 1.3×10),而与样本类型无关(P>0.7)。样本按个体聚类。配对样本间均值中心化甲基化的 Pearson 相关系数范围为 r = 0.66 至 r = 0.87。在调整多重比较后,没有一个个体位点在白细胞层和整个脐带血之间存在显著差异(5 个位点的未调整 P<10)。样本类型之间的细胞类型比例没有差异(P = 0.46),配对样本之间的估计比例高度相关(r = 0.99)。白细胞层和整个脐带血之间的甲基化和细胞组成差异远低于个体间差异,这表明这两种样本制备类型可以进行分析性组合和比较。