Neurosurgical Service, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Neurosurgical Service, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
World Neurosurg. 2018 May;113:e364-e372. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.034. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
The objective of this study was to analyze patients' perceptions of their headaches both before and after Pipeline flow diversion treatment of their unruptured intracranial aneurysms, with the goal of identifying prognostic factors associated with headache patterns to improve predictions of overall outcomes.
We retrospectively identified 133 patients treated with the Pipeline embolization device (PED) between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2016, at an academic institution in the United States. Patients with at least 6 months of clinical follow-up, who had completed a validated telephone survey assessing their headache perceptions before and after treatment of their UIAs, were included.
Sixty patients (57.7%) responded to the questionnaire. Median aneurysm size was 6.3 mm. Thirty-two patients (53.3%) presented with headaches before treatment, which had a median intensity of 7 out of 10 (range, 3-10). On postprocedural evaluation, 8 patients (25%) had complete resolution of their headaches. Of the 24 (75%) patients with persistent headaches, the frequency and severity of the headaches decreased or remained the same in most (58.3%) patients. Eleven (18.3%) patients had new-onset headaches. This study found an association between aneurysm size and a reduction in headache frequency and severity after PED treatment. No significant association was found between headache persistence, severity, or frequency and patient demographics, aneurysm characteristics, and other comorbidities.
An overall improvement of headaches in patients with UIAs who underwent treatment with the PED was observed, particularly in patients harboring large aneurysms and who had presented with daily headaches.
本研究的目的是分析患者在接受未破裂颅内动脉瘤Pipeline 血流导向装置治疗前后对头痛的感知,以确定与头痛模式相关的预后因素,从而提高对总体结果的预测能力。
我们回顾性地确定了 2014 年 1 月 1 日至 2016 年 12 月 31 日期间在美国一家学术机构接受 Pipeline 栓塞装置(PED)治疗的 133 例患者。这些患者均有至少 6 个月的临床随访,并完成了一项评估其治疗前和治疗后头痛感知的电话调查。
有 60 例患者(57.7%)对问卷调查做出了回应。动脉瘤的平均直径为 6.3 毫米。32 例患者(53.3%)在治疗前有头痛,中位数强度为 7 分(范围 3-10 分)。在术后评估中,8 例患者(25%)头痛完全缓解。在 24 例(75%)持续头痛的患者中,大多数患者(58.3%)头痛的频率和严重程度降低或保持不变。11 例患者(18.3%)出现新发头痛。本研究发现,PED 治疗后动脉瘤大小与头痛频率和严重度降低有关。未发现头痛持续存在、严重程度或频率与患者人口统计学特征、动脉瘤特征和其他合并症之间存在显著相关性。
接受 PED 治疗的未破裂颅内动脉瘤患者的头痛总体上有所改善,尤其是那些有大动脉瘤且有每日头痛的患者。