Division on Substance Use Disorders, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York.
Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.
Am J Addict. 2018 Mar;27(2):101-107. doi: 10.1111/ajad.12660. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
Many patients with cannabis use disorder (CUD) do not achieve or do not have abstinence as a goal of treatment, rather they reduce their use. Assessing outcome measures as they relate to functioning and reductions in cannabis use is an important area of study. Quality of life (QoL) shows promise as one such measure. Past studies have demonstrated gender differences in QoL and CUD. We aim to assess (1) the relationship between cannabis use and QoL and (2) gender effects in an outpatient medication treatment study for CUD.
Data from an 11-weeks, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of lofexidine and dronabinol for CUD (n = 62) was analyzed. Pearson's correlations between baseline QoL as measured with the Quality of Life, Enjoyment, and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form (QLES-Q-SF) and cannabis use assessed with modified timeline follow-back (TLFB) were examined. Multiple linear regression models of cannabis use on end of study QLES-Q-SF were analyzed, while adjusting for baseline QLES-Q-SF, study arm, and gender. Moderation effects with gender were also tested.
No significant association between baseline cannabis use and QoL was found. End of study abstinence (F 8.34, p = .006) and reduced proportion of using days (F = 9.48, p = .004) were each significantly associated with end of study QoL. Reduction in grams (F = 0.25, p = .62) was not associated with QoL at end of study. Gender was not a significant moderator.
Abstinence and lower frequency of use are associated with higher QoL, regardless of gender.
This is the first time QoL has been demonstrated to change over the course of CUD medication treatment. QoL is an important outcome in CUD treatment.
NCT01020019. (Am J Addict 2018;27:101-107).
许多大麻使用障碍(CUD)患者并未将戒断作为治疗目标,而是减少使用量。评估与功能和大麻使用减少相关的疗效指标是一个重要的研究领域。生活质量(QoL)是一种有前景的衡量标准。过去的研究表明,QoL 和 CUD 存在性别差异。我们旨在评估(1)大麻使用与 QoL 之间的关系,(2)门诊药物治疗 CUD 研究中的性别效应。
对 62 名接受可乐定和大麻隆治疗 CUD 的为期 11 周、双盲、安慰剂对照试验的数据进行了分析。使用简化时间线随访(TLFB)评估大麻使用情况,使用生活质量、享受和满意度问卷短表(QLES-Q-SF)评估基线 QoL,采用 Pearson 相关分析来检验两者之间的相关性。通过调整基线 QLES-Q-SF、研究组和性别,对大麻使用与研究结束时 QLES-Q-SF 的多元线性回归模型进行了分析。还测试了性别对调节效应的影响。
未发现基线大麻使用与 QoL 之间存在显著相关性。研究结束时的禁欲(F=8.34,p=0.006)和减少使用天数的比例(F=9.48,p=0.004)与研究结束时的 QoL 显著相关。使用量减少(F=0.25,p=0.62)与研究结束时的 QoL 无关。性别不是一个显著的调节因素。
无论性别如何,禁欲和减少使用频率都与更高的 QoL 相关。
这是首次证明 QoL 在 CUD 药物治疗过程中发生变化。QoL 是 CUD 治疗的一个重要结果。
NCT01020019.(Am J Addict 2018;27:101-107)。