Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2018 Jun;43(7):1481-1491. doi: 10.1038/s41386-018-0016-x. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
Current antidepressant therapies meet with variable therapeutic success and there is increasing interest in therapeutic approaches not based on monoamine signaling. Histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6), which also deacetylates α-tubulin shows altered expression in mood disorders and HDAC6 knockout mice mimic traditional antidepressant treatments. Nonetheless, a mechanistic understanding for HDAC6 inhibitors in the treatment of depression remains elusive. Previously, we have shown that sustained treatment of rats or glioma cells with several antidepressants translocates Gα from lipid rafts toward increased association with adenylyl cyclase (AC). Concomitant with this is a sustained increase in cAMP production. While Gα modifies microtubule dynamics, tubulin also acts as an anchor for Gα in lipid-rafts. Since HDAC-6 inhibitors potentiate α-tubulin acetylation, we hypothesize that acetylation of α-tubulin disrupts tubulin-Gα raft-anchoring, rendering Gα free to activate AC. To test this, C6 Glioma (C6) cells were treated with the HDAC-6 inhibitor, tubastatin-A. Chronic treatment with tubastatin-A not only increased α-tubulin acetylation but also translocated Gα from lipid-rafts, without changing total Gα. Reciprocally, depletion of α-tubulin acetyl-transferase-1 ablated this phenomenon. While escitalopram and imipramine also disrupt Gα/tubulin complexes and translocate Gα from rafts, they evoke no change in tubulin acetylation. Finally, two indicators of downstream cAMP signaling, cAMP response element binding protein phosphorylation (pCREB) and expression of brain-derived-neurotrophic-factor (BDNF) were both elevated by tubastatin-A. These findings suggest HDAC6 inhibitors show a cellular profile resembling traditional antidepressants, but have a distinct mode of action. They also reinforce the validity of antidepressant-induced Gα translocation from lipid-rafts as a biosignature for antidepressant response that may be useful in the development of new antidepressant compounds.
目前的抗抑郁治疗方法疗效不一,人们对非单胺信号治疗方法越来越感兴趣。组蛋白去乙酰化酶 6(HDAC6)也能使α-微管蛋白去乙酰化,在心境障碍中表达改变,HDAC6 敲除小鼠模拟传统的抗抑郁治疗。尽管如此,HDAC6 抑制剂治疗抑郁症的机制仍不清楚。我们之前已经表明,几种抗抑郁药持续治疗大鼠或神经胶质瘤细胞会使 Gα 从脂筏移位,与腺苷酸环化酶(AC)的结合增加。同时,cAMP 的产生持续增加。虽然 Gα 改变微管动力学,但微管也作为脂筏中 Gα 的锚点。由于 HDAC-6 抑制剂能增强α-微管蛋白乙酰化,我们假设α-微管蛋白的乙酰化会破坏微管蛋白-Gα 筏锚定,使 Gα 自由激活 AC。为了验证这一点,我们用 HDAC-6 抑制剂 tubastatin-A 处理 C6 神经胶质瘤(C6)细胞。慢性 tubastatin-A 处理不仅增加了α-微管蛋白的乙酰化,还使 Gα 从脂筏中移位,而总 Gα 没有变化。相反,α-微管蛋白乙酰转移酶-1 的缺失消除了这种现象。虽然依他普仑和丙咪嗪也能破坏 Gα/微管蛋白复合物并使 Gα 从筏中移位,但它们不会引起微管蛋白乙酰化的变化。最后,cAMP 信号下游的两个指标,cAMP 反应元件结合蛋白磷酸化(pCREB)和脑源性神经营养因子(BDNF)的表达都被 tubastatin-A 上调。这些发现表明,HDAC6 抑制剂表现出一种类似于传统抗抑郁药的细胞特征,但作用方式不同。它们还强化了抗抑郁药诱导的 Gα 从脂筏移位作为抗抑郁反应的生物标志物的有效性,这可能对抗抑郁化合物的开发有用。