Department of Psychiatry, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2018 Jun;39(6):2455-2471. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24014. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
One of the challenges of brain network analysis is to directly compare network organization between subjects, irrespective of the number or strength of connections. In this study, we used minimum spanning tree (MST; a unique, acyclic subnetwork with a fixed number of connections) analysis to characterize the human brain network to create an empirical reference network. Such a reference network could be used as a null model of connections that form the backbone structure of the human brain. We analyzed the MST in three diffusion-weighted imaging datasets of healthy adults. The MST of the group mean connectivity matrix was used as the empirical null-model. The MST of individual subjects matched this reference MST for a mean 58%-88% of connections, depending on the analysis pipeline. Hub nodes in the MST matched with previously reported locations of hub regions, including the so-called rich club nodes (a subset of high-degree, highly interconnected nodes). Although most brain network studies have focused primarily on cortical connections, cortical-subcortical connections were consistently present in the MST across subjects. Brain network efficiency was higher when these connections were included in the analysis, suggesting that these tracts may be utilized as the major neural communication routes. Finally, we confirmed that MST characteristics index the effects of brain aging. We conclude that the MST provides an elegant and straightforward approach to analyze structural brain networks, and to test network topological features of individual subjects in comparison to empirical null models.
脑网络分析的挑战之一是直接比较受试者之间的网络组织,而不考虑连接的数量或强度。在这项研究中,我们使用最小生成树(MST;具有固定连接数的独特无环子网)分析来描述人类大脑网络,以创建经验参考网络。这样的参考网络可以用作连接形成人类大脑骨干结构的 null 模型。我们分析了三组健康成年人的弥散加权成像数据集。使用组平均连接矩阵的 MST 作为经验 null 模型。个体受试者的 MST 与参考 MST 匹配了 58%-88%的连接,具体取决于分析流程。MST 中的枢纽节点与先前报道的枢纽区域位置相匹配,包括所谓的丰富俱乐部节点(高连接度、高度连接节点的子集)。尽管大多数脑网络研究主要集中在皮质连接上,但皮质-皮质下连接在受试者的 MST 中始终存在。当将这些连接纳入分析时,脑网络效率更高,这表明这些束可能被用作主要的神经通信途径。最后,我们证实 MST 特征指数与大脑衰老的影响。我们得出结论,MST 提供了一种优雅而直接的方法来分析结构脑网络,并比较个体受试者的网络拓扑特征与经验 null 模型。