Florida Atlantic University College of Medicine, Department of Integrated Medical Science, United States.
Stony Brook University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, United States.
Schizophr Res. 2018 Jul;197:150-155. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2018.02.009. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
Since the Iowa 500 study, residential and occupational status have been frequently used as indicators of everyday achievements in research on schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. The relationships of residential and occupational status with impairment in multiple domains including physical health indicators across these two diagnoses, however, have rarely been studied. We examined these relationships at the 20-year follow-up assessment of a first-admission sample.
We included 146 participants with schizophrenia and 87 with bipolar disorder with psychosis who participated in the 20-year follow-up of the Suffolk County Mental Health Project. In addition to interviewer-based ratings of employment and residential independence, we examined self-reported impairment derived from the WHODAS, standard measures of current psychopathology, indicators of obesity, as well as performance-based measures of physical and cognitive functioning.
Participants with bipolar disorder were more likely to live independently and be gainfully employed; they also performed significantly better on each indicator of impairment apart from balance ability. In both groups, unemployment, but not residential independence, was associated with greater self-reported disability on the WHODAS. Residential independence, gainful employment, and subjective disability were also associated with better physical functioning. Across the two groups, psychiatric symptoms and physical functioning were the major determinants of subjective disability.
People with psychotic bipolar disorder were more likely to be gainfully employed and living independently than participants with schizophrenia but as a group, much less frequently than population standards. Interventions aimed at physical fitness may have the potential to improve both objective functioning and perceived disability.
自爱荷华 500 研究以来,居住和职业状况经常被用作精神分裂症和双相情感障碍研究中日常成就的指标。然而,居住和职业状况与这两种诊断中多个领域的损伤之间的关系,包括身体健康指标,很少被研究。我们在首次入院样本的 20 年随访评估中检查了这些关系。
我们纳入了 146 名患有精神分裂症和 87 名患有伴有精神病的双相情感障碍的参与者,他们参加了萨福克县心理健康项目的 20 年随访。除了基于访谈者的就业和居住独立性评分外,我们还检查了来自 WHODAS 的自我报告损伤、当前精神病理学的标准测量、肥胖指标以及身体和认知功能的基于表现的测量。
双相情感障碍患者更有可能独立生活和有收入;他们在除了平衡能力之外的每个损伤指标上的表现也明显更好。在这两个组中,失业而不是居住独立性与 WHODAS 上更大的自我报告残疾有关。居住独立性、有收入的就业和主观残疾也与更好的身体功能有关。在这两个组中,精神症状和身体功能是主观残疾的主要决定因素。
患有精神病性双相情感障碍的人比精神分裂症患者更有可能有收入和独立生活,但作为一个群体,他们的比例远低于人口标准。旨在提高身体健康的干预措施可能有潜力改善客观功能和感知残疾。