Department of Clinical Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.
Department of Gerontism Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.
Clin Chim Acta. 2018 Jun;481:20-24. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2018.02.027. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
To investigate the value of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), alone or in combination, in diagnosing gastric cancer (GC), we retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 201 patients with GC, 161 patients with benign gastric lesions, and 157 healthy subjects. We obtained routine blood indices and CEA levels to evaluate the diagnostic value of NLR, PLR and CEA for GC, based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. We found that serum NLR, PLR and CEA in the GC group were significantly higher than those in the benign lesion group (P < 0.001,P < 0.001,P = 0.034) or the healthy control group (P < 0.001,P < 0.001,P = 0.028). Moreover, there were significant differences in NLR and PLR among different serosa invasion, lymph node metastasis, tumor size and stage. CEA showed a difference in distant metastasis and tumor size. Combining PLR with CEA produced a larger AUC (AUC: 0.780, 95% CI: 0.734-0.822) than using PLR (P = 0.011) or CEA (P < 0.001) alone. Similarly, NLR + CEA produced a larger AUC (AUC: 0.756, 95% CI:0.709-0.800) than using NLR (P = 0.004) or CEA (P = 0.001) alone. Whereas NLR, PLR and CEA are known to help distinguish GC from benign gastric lesions, combining CEA with PLR or NLR offers better diagnostic value for GC than any of them used alone.
为了探讨中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)和癌胚抗原(CEA)单独或联合在诊断胃癌(GC)中的价值,我们回顾性分析了 201 例 GC 患者、161 例良性胃病变患者和 157 例健康对照者的队列。我们获取了常规血液指标和 CEA 水平,基于受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估 NLR、PLR 和 CEA 对 GC 的诊断价值。我们发现,GC 组的血清 NLR、PLR 和 CEA 明显高于良性病变组(P < 0.001,P < 0.001,P = 0.034)或健康对照组(P < 0.001,P < 0.001,P = 0.028)。此外,不同浆膜浸润、淋巴结转移、肿瘤大小和分期之间 NLR 和 PLR 存在显著差异。CEA 在远处转移和肿瘤大小方面存在差异。与单独使用 PLR(P = 0.011)或 CEA(P < 0.001)相比,联合使用 PLR 和 CEA 产生了更大的 AUC(AUC:0.780,95%CI:0.734-0.822)。同样,NLR + CEA 产生了更大的 AUC(AUC:0.756,95%CI:0.709-0.800),优于单独使用 NLR(P = 0.004)或 CEA(P = 0.001)。虽然 NLR、PLR 和 CEA 已被证明有助于区分 GC 和良性胃病变,但与单独使用任何一种相比,联合使用 CEA 和 PLR 或 NLR 对 GC 具有更好的诊断价值。