Institute of Forensic Medicine, West China School of Basic Medical Sciences & Forensic Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Laboratory of Infection and Immunity, West China School of Preclinical and Forensic Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2018 May;34:141-147. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.02.009. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
The Tibeto-Burman language, one subfamily of the Sino-Tibetan languages, is spoken by over 60 million people all over East Asia. Yet the ethnic origin and genetic architecture of Tibeto-Burman speaking populations remain largely unexplored. In the present study, 169 Chinese individuals from Tibeto-Burman speaking populations (two ethnic groups: Tibetan and Yi) in four different geographic regions in western China were analyzed using the Precision ID Ancestry Panel (165 AISNPs) and the Ion PGM System. The performance and corresponding forensic statistical parameters of this AISNPs panel were investigated. Comprehensive population genetic comparisons (143 populations based on Kidd' SNPs, 92 populations on the basis of Seldin' SNPs and 31 populations based on the Precision ID Ancestry Panel) and ancestry inference were further performed. Sequencing performance demonstrated that the Precision ID Ancestry Panel is effective and robust. Forensic characteristics suggested that this panel not only can be used for ancestry estimation of Tibeto-Burman populations but also for individual identification. Tibetan and Yi shared a common genetic ancestry origin but experienced the complex history of gene flow, local adaptation, and isolation, and constructed the specific genetic landscape of human genetic diversity of Highlander and Lowlander populations. Tibetan-Burman populations and other East Asian populations showed sufficient genetic difference and could be distinguished into three distinct groups. Furthermore, analysis of population structure revealed that significant genetic difference was existed inter-continent populations and strong genetic affinity was observed within-continent populations. Additional population-specific AISNPs and a relatively more comprehensive database with sufficient reference population data remain necessary to get better-scale resolution within a geographically proximate populations in East Asia.
藏缅语系是汉藏语系的一个子系,被超过 6000 万人使用,遍及东亚各地。然而,藏缅语族群的民族起源和遗传结构在很大程度上仍未得到探索。在本研究中,我们分析了来自中国西部四个不同地理区域的藏缅语族群(两个民族:藏族和彝族)的 169 名个体,使用的是 Precision ID 祖先面板(165 个 AISNPs)和 Ion PGM 系统。我们研究了这个 AISNPs 面板的性能和相应的法医统计参数。进一步进行了全面的群体遗传比较(基于 Kidd' SNPs 的 143 个群体、基于 Seldin' SNPs 的 92 个群体和基于 Precision ID 祖先面板的 31 个群体)和祖先推断。测序性能表明, Precision ID 祖先面板是有效和稳健的。法医特征表明,该面板不仅可用于藏缅语族群的祖先估计,也可用于个体识别。藏族和彝族有共同的遗传起源,但经历了复杂的基因流动、局部适应和隔离历史,构建了高山和低地人群人类遗传多样性的特定遗传景观。藏缅语族群和其他东亚族群表现出足够的遗传差异,可以分为三个不同的群体。此外,群体结构分析表明,洲际群体之间存在显著的遗传差异,而洲内群体之间存在强烈的遗传亲和力。需要进一步分析群体特异性的 AISNPs 和一个相对更全面的数据库,其中包含足够的参考人群数据,以获得东亚地理上相近的人群更好的规模分辨率。